These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

594 related items for PubMed ID: 26443486

  • 1. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA, Fidan D, Türkyılmaz D, Hochmuth S, Ergenç İ, Sennaroğlu G, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, Visentin C, Astolfi A, Prodi N, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A, Zokoll M, Wardenga N, Ozimek E, Boboshko M, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S, Brand T, Zokoll MA, Castro FZ, Wardenga N, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N, Batsoulis C, Wagener KC, Brand T, Lenarz T, Maier H.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
    Dietz A, Buschermöhle M, Aarnisalo AA, Vanhanen A, Hyyrynen T, Aaltonen O, Löppönen H, Zokoll MA, Kollmeier B.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S, Kollmeier B, Brand T, Jürgens T.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Construction and evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese matrix (CMNmatrix) sentence test for the assessment of speech recognition in noise.
    Hu H, Xi X, Wong LLN, Hochmuth S, Warzybok A, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):838-850. PubMed ID: 30178681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S, Jürgens T, Brand T, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Nov; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. How much does language proficiency by non-native listeners influence speech audiometric tests in noise?
    Warzybok A, Brand T, Wagener KC, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Nov; 54 Suppl 2():88-99. PubMed ID: 26344170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Matrix sentence intelligibility prediction using an automatic speech recognition system.
    Schädler MR, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Nov; 54 Suppl 2():100-7. PubMed ID: 26383042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E, Warzybok A, Kutzner D.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Development and evaluation of a mixed gender, multi-talker matrix sentence test in Australian English.
    Kelly H, Lin G, Sankaran N, Xia J, Kalluri S, Carlile S.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Feb; 56(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 27758153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review.
    Kollmeier B, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, Zokoll MA, Uslar V, Brand T, Wagener KC.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54 Suppl 2():3-16. PubMed ID: 26383182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C, Theo Goverts S, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Characteristics and international comparability of the Finnish matrix sentence test in cochlear implant recipients.
    Dietz A, Buschermöhle M, Sivonen V, Willberg T, Aarnisalo AA, Lenarz T, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54 Suppl 2():80-7. PubMed ID: 26364512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Development and evaluation of the Cantonese matrix sentence test.
    Hu H, Hochmuth S, Man CK, Warzybok A, Kollmeier B, Wong LLN.
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Jan; 63(1):8-20. PubMed ID: 36441177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Adaptation of the STARR test for adult Italian population: A speech test for a realistic estimate in real-life listening conditions.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H, Ballantyne D, De Seta E, Musacchio A, Mancini P.
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Jan; 55(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 26795710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype.
    Zokoll MA, Wagener KC, Brand T, Buschermöhle M, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):697-707. PubMed ID: 22762202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The Norwegian Hearing in Noise Test for Children.
    Myhrum M, Tvete OE, Heldahl MG, Moen I, Soli SD.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Sep; 37(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 26462169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.