These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

764 related items for PubMed ID: 26448167

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty.
    Bahar I, Kaiserman I, McAllum P, Slomovic A, Rootman D.
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1525-33. PubMed ID: 18440638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study.
    Heinzelmann S, Böhringer D, Eberwein P, Reinhard T, Maier P.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 254(3):515-22. PubMed ID: 26743748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Treatment of Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty.
    Einan-Lifshitz A, Mednick Z, Belkin A, Sorkin N, Alshaker S, Boutin T, Chan CC, Rootman DS.
    Cornea; 2019 Sep; 38(9):1077-1082. PubMed ID: 31394551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for bullous keratopathy with an irregular posterior surface.
    Hayashi T, Hirayama Y, Yamada N, Shimazaki-Den S, Shimazaki J.
    Cornea; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1183-8. PubMed ID: 23846407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty outcomes compared with penetrating keratoplasty from the Cornea Donor Study.
    Price MO, Gorovoy M, Benetz BA, Price FW, Menegay HJ, Debanne SM, Lass JH.
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Mar; 117(3):438-44. PubMed ID: 20031230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Retrospective contralateral study comparing descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty.
    Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Levinger E, Sansanayudh W, Slomovic AR, Rootman DS.
    Cornea; 2009 Jun; 28(5):485-8. PubMed ID: 19421053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty.
    Woo JH, Ang M, Htoon HM, Tan D.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 207():288-303. PubMed ID: 31228467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Graft rejection and failure following endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty for secondary endothelial failure.
    Pedersen IB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 93(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 25130326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Outcome of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty.
    Khairallah AS.
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 24(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 28936052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 39.