These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
326 related items for PubMed ID: 26469902
1. Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Jiang Q, Qiu Y, Yang C, Yang J, Chen M, Zhang Z. Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Oct; 94(41):e1685. PubMed ID: 26469902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Study of Piezoelectric and Rotary Osteotomy Technique for Third Molar Impaction. Basheer SA, Govind RJ, Daniel A, Sam G, Adarsh VJ, Rao A. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jan 01; 18(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 28050988 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Piezoelectric compared with conventional rotary osteotomy for the prevention of postoperative sequelae and complications after surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Badenoch-Jones EK, David M, Lincoln T. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec 01; 54(10):1066-1079. PubMed ID: 27832920 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Osteotomy: A Comparison of Techniques in the Extraction of Unerupted Mandibular Third Molars in Children. Yang L, Chen Y, Fang W. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun 01; 80(6):1078-1083. PubMed ID: 35300957 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the piezoelectric surgical technique produce fewer postoperative sequelae after lower third molar surgery than conventional rotary instruments? A systematic review and meta analysis. Al-Moraissi EA, Elmansi YA, Al-Sharaee YA, Alrmali AE, Alkhutari AS. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar 01; 45(3):383-91. PubMed ID: 26572830 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Conventional Rotary Technique and Piezosurgical Technique in the Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Comparative Study. Hamza SP, Aslam S, Roshni A, Cherian MP, Soman S, Akhila K. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Feb 01; 24(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 37272140 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of platelet-rich fibrin and piezosurgery on impacted mandibular third molar surgery outcomes. Uyanık LO, Bilginaylar K, Etikan İ. Head Face Med; 2015 Jul 26; 11():25. PubMed ID: 26209242 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of clinical parameters and environmental noise levels between regular surgery and piezosurgery for extraction of impacted third molars. Chang HH, Lee MS, Hsu YC, Tsai SJ, Lin CP. J Formos Med Assoc; 2015 Oct 11; 114(10):929-35. PubMed ID: 24661578 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of postoperative morbidity between piezoelectric surgery and conventional rotary instruments in mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth clinical study. Gulnahar Y, Alpan AL. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2021 May 01; 26(3):e269-e275. PubMed ID: 33772570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of the technique of piezoelectric corticotomy for orthodontic traction of impacted mandibular third molars. Ma Z, Xu G, Yang C, Xie Q, Shen Y, Zhang S. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr 01; 53(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 25638568 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]