These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

326 related items for PubMed ID: 26469902

  • 21. Evaluation of the effects of platelet-rich fibrin and piezosurgery on outcomes after removal of ımpacted mandibular third molars.
    Bilginaylar K, Uyanik LO.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 54(6):629-33. PubMed ID: 27044941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Clinical efficacy of a new fully piezoelectric technique for third molar root extraction without using manual tools: a clinical randomized controlled study.
    Fabrizio F, Grusovin MG, Gavatta M, Vercellotti T.
    Quintessence Int; 2020 Jul; 51(5):406-414. PubMed ID: 32253392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.
    Coulthard P, Bailey E, Esposito M, Furness S, Renton TF, Worthington HV.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul 29; (7):CD004345. PubMed ID: 25069437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Is the Er: YAG Laser Effective in Reducing Pain, Edema, and Trismus After Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars? A Meta-Analysis.
    Sales PHDH, Barros AWP, Silva PGB, Vescovi P, Leão JC.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Mar 29; 80(3):501-516. PubMed ID: 34793714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A Clinical Comparison of Er:YAG Laser, Piezosurgery, and Conventional Bur Methods in the Impacted Third Molar Surgery.
    Genç BGÇ, Orhan K, Or S.
    Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2023 Jun 29; 41(6):283-290. PubMed ID: 37335617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Comparative evaluation of surgical outcome after removal of impacted mandibular third molars using a Piezotome or a conventional handpiece: a prospective study.
    Goyal M, Marya K, Jhamb A, Chawla S, Sonoo PR, Singh V, Aggarwal A.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep 29; 50(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 22088359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments in impacted third molar surgery: relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain with histological evaluations.
    Rullo R, Addabbo F, Papaccio G, D'Aquino R, Festa VM.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar 29; 41(2):e33-8. PubMed ID: 22890087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The piezoelectric and rotatory osteotomy technique in impacted third molar surgery: comparison of postoperative recovery.
    Sortino F, Pedullà E, Masoli V.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec 29; 66(12):2444-8. PubMed ID: 19022121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. RE: Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Osteotomy: A Comparison of Techniques in the Extraction of Uneruped Mandibular Third Molars in Children.
    Ohta K.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Aug 29; 80(8):1311. PubMed ID: 35580723
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. A split-mouth study comparing piezo electric surgery and traditional rotary burs on impacted third molars in young patients: an intraoperative and postoperative evaluation.
    Zara F, De Sanctis CM, Dede FC, Bossù M, Sfasciotti GL.
    Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Oct 29; 69(5):278-285. PubMed ID: 32407060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Piezosurgery or conventional rotatory instruments for inferior third molar extractions?
    Piersanti L, Dilorenzo M, Monaco G, Marchetti C.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep 29; 72(9):1647-52. PubMed ID: 25109581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Cryotherapy in reducing pain, trismus, and facial swelling after third-molar surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    do Nascimento-Júnior EM, Dos Santos GMS, Tavares Mendes ML, Cenci M, Correa MB, Pereira-Cenci T, Martins-Filho PRS.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2019 Apr 29; 150(4):269-277.e1. PubMed ID: 30798949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Piezo Versus Conventional Rotary Surgery for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Saraiva Amaral J, Marto CM, Farias J, Alves Pereira D, Ermida J, Banaco Á, Campos Felino A, Caramelo F, Matos S.
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2022 Jun 25; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 35877327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.
    Bailey E, Kashbour W, Shah N, Worthington HV, Renton TF, Coulthard P.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul 26; 7(7):CD004345. PubMed ID: 32712962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The piezoelectric osteotomy technique compared to the one with rotary instruments in the surgery of included third molars. A clinical study.
    Itro A, Lupo G, Marra A, Carotenuto A, Cocozza E, Filipi M, D'Amato S.
    Minerva Stomatol; 2012 Jun 26; 61(6):247-53. PubMed ID: 22669054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Comparative and clinical evaluation between piezoelectric and conventional rotary techniques for mandibular impacted third molar extraction.
    Sharma AK, Gupta A, Pabari HP, Pathak SK, Odedra NH, Beniwal J, Arora KS.
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jun 26; 14(2):208-212. PubMed ID: 37661971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Randomized clinical study comparing Piezoelectric Surgery with conventional rotatory osteotomy in mandibular third molars surgeries.
    Al-Delayme RMA.
    Saudi Dent J; 2021 Jan 26; 33(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 33473237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Piezosurgery for the Lingual Split Technique in Lingual Positioned Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Removal: A Retrospective Study.
    Ge J, Yang C, Zheng J, Qian W.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar 26; 95(12):e3192. PubMed ID: 27015214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Piezoelectric bone surgery compared with conventional rotary instruments in oral surgery and implantology: Summary and consensus statements of the International Piezoelectric Surgery Academy Consensus Conference 2019.
    Bassi F, Cicciù M, Di Lenarda R, Galindo Moreno P, Galli F, Herford AS, Jokstad A, Lombardi T, Nevins M, Sennerby L, Schierano G, Testori T, Troiano G, Vercellotti T, Stacchi C.
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2020 Mar 26; 13(3):235-239. PubMed ID: 32879928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Secondary versus primary closure techniques for the prevention of postoperative complications following removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Carrasco-Labra A, Brignardello-Petersen R, Yanine N, Araya I, Guyatt G.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug 26; 70(8):e441-57. PubMed ID: 22695015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.