These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Weak Points of a Stapled Side-to-Side Anastomosis. Kimura M, Takahashi H, Tanaka T, Sagawa H, Takeyama H. Hepatogastroenterology; 2015 Jun; 62(140):924-6. PubMed ID: 26902029 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving the side-to-side stapled anastomosis: comparison of staplers for robust crotch formation. Kimura M, Kuwabara Y, Taniwaki S, Mitsui A, Shibata Y, Ueno S. Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 Jan; 14(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 29108894 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Profiling Surgical Staplers: How to Increase the Strength of Anastomoses between the Edematous and Normal Intestine. Kimura M, Terashita Y. Am Surg; 2016 Dec 01; 82(12):e333-335. PubMed ID: 28234160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Profiling surgical staplers: effect of staple height, buttress, and overlap on staple line failure. Mery CM, Shafi BM, Binyamin G, Morton JM, Gertner M. Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2008 Dec 01; 4(3):416-22. PubMed ID: 18226977 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ex vivo pneumostasis evaluation of a variable-height staple design. Contini E, Godek ML, Whiffen JM, Bronson DG. Innovations (Phila); 2013 Dec 01; 8(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 24145973 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of bioabsorbable seamguard for staple line reinforcement in stapled rectal anastomoses. Fajardo AD, Amador-Ortiz C, Chun J, Stewart D, Fleshman JW. Surg Innov; 2012 Sep 01; 19(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 22158845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of burst pressure between buttressed versus non-buttressed staple-lines in an animal model. Arnold W, Shikora SA. Obes Surg; 2005 Feb 01; 15(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 15802057 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the LigaSure(™) Vessel Sealing System for bowel transection and intestinal anastomosis-an experimental study in a porcine model. Gehrig T, Billeter AT, Wekerle AL, Shevchenko M, Brand K, Müller-Stich BP. Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2016 May 01; 401(3):381-7. PubMed ID: 27007724 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A new technique for intestinal isoperistaltic anastomosis utilizing a linear stapler for enlargement after anastomosis performed with a circular stapler. Takeyama H, Sawai H, Sato M, Akamo Y, Yamamoto M, Funahashi H, Manabe T. Surg Endosc; 2007 Oct 01; 21(10):1891-4. PubMed ID: 17436044 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of tissue compression on circular stapler line failure. Myers SR, Rothermel WS, Shaffer L. Surg Endosc; 2011 Sep 01; 25(9):3043-9. PubMed ID: 21487874 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Different characteristics of circular staplers make the difference in anastomotic tensile strength. Giaccaglia V, Antonelli MS, Franceschilli L, Salvi PF, Gaspari AL, Sileri P. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jan 01; 53():295-300. PubMed ID: 26379251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Common side closure type, but not stapler brand or oversewing, influences side-to-side anastomotic leak rates. Fleetwood VA, Gross KN, Alex GC, Cortina CS, Smolevitz JB, Sarvepalli S, Bakhsh SR, Poirier J, Myers JA, Singer MA, Orkin BA. Am J Surg; 2017 Mar 01; 213(3):590-595. PubMed ID: 28148456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]