These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

570 related items for PubMed ID: 26497086

  • 1. A Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Versus Conventional Plate Fixation for Distal Fibula Fractures in Trimalleolar Ankle Injuries.
    Nguyentat A, Camisa W, Patel S, Lagaay P.
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(1):132-5. PubMed ID: 26497086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A biomechanical comparison of one-third tubular plates versus periarticular plates for fixation of osteoporotic distal fibula fractures.
    Davis AT, Israel H, Cannada LK, Bledsoe JG.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Sep; 27(9):e201-7. PubMed ID: 23249893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of a lateral polyaxial locking plate with a posterolateral polyaxial locking plate applied to the distal fibula.
    Hallbauer J, Klos K, Rausch S, Gräfenstein A, Wipf F, Beimel C, Hofmann G, Mückley T.
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2014 Sep; 20(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 25103705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of modern locked plating and antiglide plating for fixation of osteoporotic distal fibular fractures.
    Switaj PJ, Wetzel RJ, Jain NP, Weatherford BM, Ren Y, Zhang LQ, Merk BR.
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Sep; 22(3):158-163. PubMed ID: 27502223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A biomechanical comparison study of a modern fibular nail and distal fibular locking plate in AO/OTA 44C2 ankle fractures.
    Switaj PJ, Fuchs D, Alshouli M, Patwardhan AG, Voronov LI, Muriuki M, Havey RM, Kadakia AR.
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Sep 15; 11(1):100. PubMed ID: 27628500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Fixation of osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: A biomechanical comparison of locking versus conventional plates.
    Kim T, Ayturk UM, Haskell A, Miclau T, Puttlitz CM.
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2007 Sep 15; 46(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 17198946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Locking versus non-locking one-third tubular plates for treating osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: a comparative study.
    Herrera-Pérez M, Gutiérrez-Morales MJ, Guerra-Ferraz A, Pais-Brito JL, Boluda-Mengod J, Garcés GL.
    Injury; 2017 Nov 15; 48 Suppl 6():S60-S65. PubMed ID: 29162244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Biomechanical analysis of polyaxial locking vs. non-locking plate fixation of unstable fractures of the distal fibula: A cadaver study with a bone only model.
    Hallbauer J, Gräfenstein A, Rausch S, Knobe M, Simons P, Mückley T, Hofmann GO, Klos K.
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Aug 15; 24(4):326-329. PubMed ID: 29409241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of Locking Versus Nonlocking Plates for Distal Fibula Fractures.
    Lyle SA, Malik C, Oddy MJ.
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Aug 15; 57(4):664-667. PubMed ID: 29681437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of 4 different lateral plate constructs for distal fibula fractures.
    Eckel TT, Glisson RR, Anand P, Parekh SG.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Nov 15; 34(11):1588-95. PubMed ID: 23818460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of lateral locking plate and antiglide plate for fixation of distal fibular fractures in osteoporotic bone: a biomechanical study.
    Minihane KP, Lee C, Ahn C, Zhang LQ, Merk BR.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Sep 15; 20(8):562-6. PubMed ID: 16990728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A locking contoured plate for distal fibular fractures: mechanical evaluation in an osteoporotic bone model using screws of different length.
    Zahn RK, Jakubietz M, Frey S, Doht S, Sauer A, Meffert RH.
    J Appl Biomech; 2014 Feb 15; 30(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 23676259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Does a polyaxial-locking system confer benefits for osteosynthesis of the distal fibula: A cadaver study.
    Hallbauer J, Klos K, Gräfenstein A, Simons P, Rausch S, Mückley T, Hofmann GO.
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Sep 15; 102(5):645-9. PubMed ID: 27179630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of fibular plate fixation on rotational stability of simulated distal tibial fractures treated with intramedullary nailing.
    Kumar A, Charlebois SJ, Cain EL, Smith RA, Daniels AU, Crates JM.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Apr 15; 85(4):604-8. PubMed ID: 12672833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of augmentation methods for internal fixation of osteoporotic ankle fractures.
    Panchbhavi VK, Vallurupalli S, Morris R.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2009 Jul 15; 30(7):696-703. PubMed ID: 19589319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Biomechanical Comparison of Volar Fixed-Angle Locking Plates for AO C3 Distal Radius Fractures: Titanium Versus Stainless Steel With Compression.
    Marshall T, Momaya A, Eberhardt A, Chaudhari N, Hunt TR.
    J Hand Surg Am; 2015 Oct 15; 40(10):2032-8. PubMed ID: 26253601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Implant Failure Rates and Cost Analysis of Contoured Locking Versus Conventional Plate Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures.
    Moss LK, Kim-Orden MH, Ravinsky R, Hoshino CM, Zinar DM, Gold SM.
    Orthopedics; 2017 Nov 01; 40(6):e1024-e1029. PubMed ID: 29058759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Biomechanical Analysis of Stability of Posterior Antiglide Plating in Osteoporotic Pronation Abduction Ankle Fracture Model With Posterior Tibial Fragment.
    Hartwich K, Lorente Gomez A, Pyrc J, Gut R, Rammelt S, Grass R.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2017 Jan 01; 38(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 27672062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.