These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

152 related items for PubMed ID: 26506164

  • 21. A prospective comparison of postoperative pain and quality of life in robotic assisted vs conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
    Zechmeister JR, Pua TL, Boyd LR, Blank SV, Curtin JP, Pothuri B.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):194.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25108142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Conventional laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy: tips and tricks.
    Lenger SM, White WM.
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 26448443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Outcomes and Postoperative Complications of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterosacropexy: Initial Experience.
    Cerruto MA, D'Elia C, Cavicchioli FM, Cavalleri S, Balzarro M, Porcaro AB, Curti P, Artibani W.
    Urol Int; 2015 Feb; 95(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 25720418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Implementation of a new procedure: laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Awad N, Mustafa S, Amit A, Deutsch M, Eldor-Itskovitz J, Lowenstein L.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1181-6. PubMed ID: 23274792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Surgical Scar Location Preference for Pediatric Kidney and Pelvic Surgery: A Crowdsourced Survey.
    Garcia-Roig ML, Travers C, McCracken C, Cerwinka W, Kirsch JM, Kirsch AJ.
    J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 2):911-919. PubMed ID: 27840123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique.
    Mourik SL, Martens JE, Aktas M.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 22897838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Single Port Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: Our Experience With the First 25 Cases.
    Matanes E, Lauterbach R, Mustafa-Mikhail S, Amit A, Wiener Z, Lowenstein L.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017 Nov; 23(3):e14-e18. PubMed ID: 28134702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Reoperation After Robotic and Vaginal Mesh Reconstructive Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Martin LA, Calixte R, Finamore PS.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015 Nov; 21(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 26506158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Technical preferences of surgeons performing a sacrocolpopexy procedure.
    Bassaly R, McCullough M, Hussamy D, Downes K, Hoyte L, Hart S.
    Surg Technol Int; 2012 Dec; 22():189-94. PubMed ID: 23315720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: how to choose the best approach.
    El Kassis N, Atallah D, Moukarzel M, Ghaname W, Chalouhy C, Suidan J, Villet R, Salet-Lizee D.
    J Med Liban; 2013 Dec; 61(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 24260839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Ploumidis A, Spinoit AF, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Gan M, Ficarra V, Volpe A, Mottrie A.
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.