These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
841 related items for PubMed ID: 26515955
1. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems. Robertson M, Majumdar A, Boyapati R, Chung W, Worland T, Terbah R, Wei J, Lontos S, Angus P, Vaughan R. Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study. Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, Ngu JH, Schultz M, Abazi R, Zakko L, Thornton S, Wilkinson K, Khor CJ, Murray IA, Laursen SB, International Gastrointestinal Bleeding Consortium. BMJ; 2017 Jan 04; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding. Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, Yam C, Schoeman MN, Holloway RH, Nguyen NQ. Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct 04; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Kim MS, Choi J, Shin WC. BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul 26; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study. Akhila Arya PV, Thulaseedharan NK, Raj R, Unnikrishnan DC, Jacob A. Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug 26; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding. Robertson M, Ng J, Abu Shawish W, Swaine A, Skardoon G, Huynh A, Deshpande S, Low ZY, Sievert W, Angus P. Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul 26; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding. Hyett BH, Abougergi MS, Charpentier JP, Kumar NL, Brozovic S, Claggett BL, Travis AC, Saltzman JR. Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr 26; 77(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 23357496 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding. Budimir I, Gradišer M, Nikolić M, Baršić N, Ljubičić N, Kralj D, Budimir I. Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov 26; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality. Martínez-Cara JG, Jiménez-Rosales R, Úbeda-Muñoz M, de Hierro ML, de Teresa J, Redondo-Cerezo E. United European Gastroenterol J; 2016 Jun 26; 4(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 27403303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Park SM, Yeum SC, Kim BW, Kim JS, Kim JH, Sim EH, Ji JS, Choi H. Gut Liver; 2016 Jul 15; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A Prospective, Multicenter Study of the AIMS65 Score Compared With the Glasgow-Blatchford Score in Predicting Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Outcomes. Abougergi MS, Charpentier JP, Bethea E, Rupawala A, Kheder J, Nompleggi D, Liang P, Travis AC, Saltzman JR. J Clin Gastroenterol; 2016 Jul 15; 50(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 26302496 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of risk scores and shock index in hemodynamically stable patients presenting to the emergency department with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Jung DH, Ko BS, Kim YJ, Kim WY. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Jul 15; 31(7):781-785. PubMed ID: 31008809 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study. Rout G, Sharma S, Gunjan D, Kedia S, Nayak B, Shalimar. Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr 15; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Wang CH, Chen YW, Young YR, Yang CJ, Chen IC. Am J Emerg Med; 2013 May 15; 31(5):775-8. PubMed ID: 23465874 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru]. Espinoza-Ríos J, Aguilar Sánchez V, Bravo Paredes EA, Pinto Valdivia J, Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J. Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016 May 15; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of the Shock Index for Risk Stratification in Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Rassameehiran S, Teerakanok J, Suchartlikitwong S, Nugent K. South Med J; 2017 Nov 15; 110(11):738-743. PubMed ID: 29100227 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Lu X, Zhang X, Chen H. Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Jun 15; 112(6):467-473. PubMed ID: 32379473 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]