These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

551 related items for PubMed ID: 26525003

  • 1. Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Bonding Parameters on the Clinical Outcome of Tooth-colored Cervical Restorations.
    Mahn E, Rousson V, Heintze S.
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):391-403. PubMed ID: 26525003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
    van Dijken JW, Pallesen U.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
    Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF.
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF.
    J Adhes Dent; 2003 Feb; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
    Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.
    Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A 13-year clinical evaluation of two three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious class-V lesions.
    Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 20931252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Franco EB, Benetti AR, Ishikiriama SK, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Jorge MF, Navarro MF.
    Oper Dent; 2006 Feb; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M, Karvandi TM, Kamali B, Mazaheri H.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Feb; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. One-year Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite Restorations of Noncarious Cervical Lesions in Smokers.
    de Carvalho LD, Gondo R, Lopes GC.
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 26525004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results.
    Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11572293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influence of adhesive strategy on clinical parameters in cervical restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schroeder M, Correa IC, Bauer J, Loguercio AD, Reis A.
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():36-53. PubMed ID: 28495559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Longevity of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a polyacid-modified resin composite restoring non-carious cervical lesions in a general dental practice.
    Smales RJ, Ng KK.
    Aust Dent J; 2004 Dec; 49(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 15762341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions.
    van Dijken JW.
    Dent Mater; 2000 Jul; 16(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 10831784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H.
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of operator experience on non-carious cervical lesion restorations: Clinical evaluation with different adhesive systems.
    Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, Manzon E, Breschi L, Paolino D, Pasqualini D, Berutti E.
    Am J Dent; 2016 Feb; 29(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 27093774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The two-year clinical performance of esthetic restorative materials in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Onal B, Pamir T.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Nov; 136(11):1547-55. PubMed ID: 16329418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year.
    Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Fieuws S, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Ermis RB, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B.
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):847-55. PubMed ID: 18656295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Two-year clinical evaluation of resinous restorative systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Santiago SL, Passos VF, Vieira AH, Navarro MF, Lauris JR, Franco EB.
    Braz Dent J; 2010 Oct; 21(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 21203706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.