These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

144 related items for PubMed ID: 26538617

  • 1. CHARACTERISING THE EOS SLOT-SCANNING SYSTEM WITH THE EFFECTIVE DETECTIVE QUANTUM EFFICIENCY.
    Clavel AH, Monnin P, Létang JM, Verdun FR, Darbon A.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):319-24. PubMed ID: 26538617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS, Gopal A.
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May 21; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effective detective quantum efficiency for two mammography systems: measurement and comparison against established metrics.
    Salvagnini E, Bosmans H, Struelens L, Marshall NW.
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct 21; 40(10):101916. PubMed ID: 24089918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency.
    Bertolini M, Nitrosi A, Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Pattacini P, Ginocchi V, Iori M.
    Med Phys; 2012 May 21; 39(5):2617-27. PubMed ID: 22559632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for pediatric radiology.
    Monnin P, Holzer Z, Wolf R, Neitzel U, Vock P, Gudinchet F, Verdun FR.
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb 21; 33(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 16532949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors.
    Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, Bakhtiar B, Richard S, Jaffray DA.
    Med Phys; 2004 Dec 21; 31(12):3506-20. PubMed ID: 15651634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
    Fetterly KA, Schueler BA.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug 21; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep 21; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter in a 256-slice CT scanner.
    Endo M, Mori S, Tsunoo T, Miyazaki H.
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep 21; 33(9):3359-68. PubMed ID: 17022232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of entrance exposure and signal-to-noise ratio between an SBDX prototype and a wide-beam cardiac angiographic system.
    Speidel MA, Wilfley BP, Star-Lack JM, Heanue JA, Betts TD, Van Lysel MS.
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug 21; 33(8):2728-43. PubMed ID: 16964848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. High-resolution imager for digital mammography: physical characterization of a prototype sensor.
    Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Onishi SK.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep 07; 50(17):3957-69. PubMed ID: 16177523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comment on "an inverse-geometry volumetric CT system with a large-area scanned source: a feasibility study" [Med. Phys. 31, 2623-2627 (2004)].
    Silver MD.
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb 07; 32(2):635; author reply 636. PubMed ID: 15789610
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy of the CT numbers of simulated lung nodules imaged with multi-detector CT scanners.
    Goodsitt MM, Chan HP, Way TW, Larson SC, Christodoulou EG, Kim J.
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug 07; 33(8):3006-17. PubMed ID: 16964879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Scatter rejection in multislit digital mammography.
    Aslund M, Cederström B, Lundqvist M, Danielsson M.
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr 07; 33(4):933-40. PubMed ID: 16696469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
    Sawant A, Antonuk LE, El-Mohri Y, Zhao Q, Li Y, Su Z, Wang Y, Yamamoto J, Du H, Cunningham I, Klugerman M, Shah K.
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct 07; 32(10):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16279059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.
    Elbakri IA, Tesic MM, Xiong Q.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr 21; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.