These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a reconstruction cage device and a cemented dual mobility cup. Schneider L, Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 97(8):807-13. PubMed ID: 22119512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual mobility cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: dislocation rate and survival after 5 years. Simian E, Chatellard R, Druon J, Berhouet J, Rosset P. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Sep; 101(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 26138633 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. LUMiC® Endoprosthetic Reconstruction After Periacetabular Tumor Resection: Short-term Results. Bus MP, Szafranski A, Sellevold S, Goryn T, Jutte PC, Bramer JA, Fiocco M, Streitbürger A, Kotrych D, van de Sande MA, Dijkstra PD. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):686-695. PubMed ID: 27020434 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone]. Girard J, Herent S, Combes A, Pinoit Y, Soenen M, Laffargue P, Migaud H. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement. Maruyama M, Wakabayashi S, Ota H, Tensho K. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement]. Kubinec V. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018 Feb; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of dual-mobility acetabular implants on revision and survivorship of cup and Kerboull-type reinforcement ring constructs in aseptic acetabular loosening. Bozon O, Dagneaux L, Sanchez T, Gaillard F, Hamoui M, Canovas F. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 108(2):103071. PubMed ID: 34560312 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of dual mobility cup cemented into a tantalum acetabular shell for hip revision with large bone loss can decrease dislocation risk without increasing the risk of mechanical failure. Hitz O, Le Baron M, Jacquet C, Argenson JN, Parratte S, Ollivier M, Flecher X. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 Apr; 110(2):103739. PubMed ID: 37918693 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years. Colo E, Rijnen WH, Gardeniers JW, van Kampen A, Schreurs BW. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity. Amenabar T, Rahman WA, Hetaimish BM, Kuzyk PR, Safir OA, Gross AE. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 25712864 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years? Verspeek J, Nijenhuis TA, Kuijpers MFL, Rijnen WHC, Schreurs BW. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan 01; 479(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 32898047 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft. Bardou-Jacquet J, Souillac V, Mouton A, Chauveaux D. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun 01; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Ganz acetabular reinforcement ring shows excellent long-term results when used as a primary implant: a retrospective analysis of two hundred and forty primary total hip arthroplasties with a minimum follow-up of twenty years. Attinger MC, Haefeli PC, Bäcker HC, Flueckiger R, Ballmer PM, Siebenrock KA, Klenke FM. Int Orthop; 2019 Dec 01; 43(12):2697-2705. PubMed ID: 30663000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device for Paprosky type III defects involving the inferior margin of the acetabulum: a minimum five-year follow-up study. Gibon E, Barut N, Courpied JP, Hamadouche M. Bone Joint J; 2018 Jun 01; 100-B(6):725-732. PubMed ID: 29855248 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft]. Parratte S, Argenson JN, Flecher X, Aubaniac JM. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 May 01; 93(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 17534208 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years. Hannouche D, Devriese F, Delambre J, Zadegan F, Tourabaly I, Sedel L, Chevret S, Nizard R. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb 01; 474(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 26341897 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]