These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
134 related items for PubMed ID: 26542387
1. First results of automated RAPD-SWIFT method in dynamic pupillometry. Cayless A, Bende T. Z Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 26(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 26542387 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Automated swinging flashlight test in patients with optic nerve diseases]. Wilhelm B, Lüdtke H, Peters T, Schmid R, Wilhelm H, Zrenner E. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Jan; 218(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11225395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation and calibration of a binocular infrared pupillometer for measuring relative afferent pupillary defect. Shwe-Tin A, Smith GT, Checketts D, Murdoch IE, Taylor D. J Neuroophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 32(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 22246058 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The prevalence of relative afferent pupillary defects in normal subjects. Wilhelm H, Peters T, Lüdtke H, Wilhelm B. J Neuroophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 27(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 18090558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Portable pupillography of the swinging flashlight test to detect afferent pupillary defects. Volpe NJ, Plotkin ES, Maguire MG, Hariprasad R, Galetta SL. Ophthalmology; 2000 Oct; 107(10):1913-21; discussion 1922. PubMed ID: 11013198 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry]. Wilhelm H, Meilinger S, Apfelstedt E. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Jun; 210(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 9333662 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Objective characterization of the relative afferent pupillary defect in MS. Blazek P, Davis SL, Greenberg BM, Conger A, Conger D, Vernino S, Beh S, Stuve O, Saidha S, Ratchford JN, Green A, Calabresi PA, Balcer LJ, Frohman TC, Frohman EM. J Neurol Sci; 2012 Dec 15; 323(1-2):193-200. PubMed ID: 23026533 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The usefulness of a new method of testing for a relative afferent pupillary defect in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Lankaranian D, Altangerel U, Spaeth GL, Leavitt JA, Steinmann WC. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2005 Aug 15; 103():200-7; discussion 207-8. PubMed ID: 17057803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pupillography of relative afferent pupillary defect contralateral to monocular mature cataract. Miki A, Iijima A, Takagi M, Usui T, Hasegawa S, Abe H, Bando T. Can J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug 15; 41(4):469-71. PubMed ID: 16883363 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative afferent pupillary defect in glaucoma: a pupillometric study. Kalaboukhova L, Fridhammar V, Lindblom B. Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Aug 15; 85(5):519-25. PubMed ID: 17573859 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Origin of the relative afferent pupillary defect in optic tract lesions. Kardon R, Kawasaki A, Miller NR. Ophthalmology; 2006 Aug 15; 113(8):1345-53. PubMed ID: 16877073 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Associating the magnitude of relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) with visual field indices in glaucoma patients. Schiefer U, Dietzsch J, Dietz K, Wilhelm B, Bruckmann A, Wilhelm H, Kitiratschky V, Januschowski K. Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 May 15; 96(5):629-33. PubMed ID: 22328816 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]