These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
271 related items for PubMed ID: 26572830
21. Rotary Instrument or Piezoelectric for the Removal of Third Molars: a Meta-Analysis. Magesty RA, Galvão EL, de Castro Martins C, Dos Santos CRR, Falci SGM. J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2017 Mar; 16(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 28286381 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The piezoelectric and rotatory osteotomy technique in impacted third molar surgery: comparison of postoperative recovery. Sortino F, Pedullà E, Masoli V. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2444-8. PubMed ID: 19022121 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of piezosurgery compared with traditional technique in lower wisdom tooth removal. Mantovani E, Arduino PG, Schierano G, Ferrero L, Gallesio G, Mozzati M, Russo A, Scully C, Carossa S. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):1890-7. PubMed ID: 25234524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative evaluation of surgical outcome after removal of impacted mandibular third molars using a Piezotome or a conventional handpiece: a prospective study. Goyal M, Marya K, Jhamb A, Chawla S, Sonoo PR, Singh V, Aggarwal A. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 50(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 22088359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Piezosurgery vs conventional rotary instrument in the third molar surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Liu J, Hua C, Pan J, Han B, Tang X. J Dent Sci; 2018 Dec; 13(4):342-349. PubMed ID: 30895143 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A randomized clinical evaluation of ultrasound bone surgery versus traditional rotary instruments in lower third molar extraction. Barone A, Marconcini S, Giacomelli L, Rispoli L, Calvo JL, Covani U. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):330-6. PubMed ID: 20116704 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Is adjuvant laser therapy effective for preventing pain, swelling, and trismus after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brignardello-Petersen R, Carrasco-Labra A, Araya I, Yanine N, Beyene J, Shah PS. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1789-801. PubMed ID: 22398186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Surgical Outcome after Impacted Third Molar Surgery Using Piezotome and a Conventional Rotary Handpiece. Srivastava P, Shetty P, Shetty S. Contemp Clin Dent; 2018 Sep; 9(Suppl 2):S318-S324. PubMed ID: 30294165 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Piezoelectric Surgery Versus Conventional Osteotomy in Impacted Lower Third Molar Extraction: Evaluation of Perioperative Anxiety, Pain, and Paresthesia. Kirli Topcu SI, Palancioglu A, Yaltirik M, Koray M. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 77(3):471-477. PubMed ID: 30578750 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]