These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

411 related items for PubMed ID: 26577365

  • 1. Particle Image Velocimetry Used to Qualitatively Validate Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulations in an Oxygenator: A Proof of Concept.
    Schlanstein PC, Hesselmann F, Jansen SV, Gemsa J, Kaufmann TA, Klaas M, Roggenkamp D, Schröder W, Schmitz-Rode T, Steinseifer U, Arens J.
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2015 Sep; 6(3):340-51. PubMed ID: 26577365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Validation of an axial flow blood pump: computational fluid dynamics results using particle image velocimetry.
    Su B, Chua LP, Wang X.
    Artif Organs; 2012 Apr; 36(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 22040356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Steady Flow in a Patient-Averaged Inferior Vena Cava-Part II: Computational Fluid Dynamics Verification and Validation.
    Craven BA, Aycock KI, Manning KB.
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):654-673. PubMed ID: 30446978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Numerical simulation of bubble induced shear in membrane bioreactors: effects of mixed liquor rheology and membrane configuration.
    Liu X, Wang Y, Waite TD, Leslie G.
    Water Res; 2015 May 15; 75():131-45. PubMed ID: 25768986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Multilaboratory particle image velocimetry analysis of the FDA benchmark nozzle model to support validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations.
    Hariharan P, Giarra M, Reddy V, Day SW, Manning KB, Deutsch S, Stewart SF, Myers MR, Berman MR, Burgreen GW, Paterson EG, Malinauskas RA.
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Apr 15; 133(4):041002. PubMed ID: 21428676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of ultrasound vector flow imaging and CFD simulations with PIV measurements of flow in a left ventricular outflow trackt phantom - Implications for clinical use and in silico studies.
    Leinan PR, Grønli T, Skjetne P, Wigen MS, Urheim S, Lovstakken L, Dahl SK.
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Jul 15; 146():105358. PubMed ID: 35751181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Analysis of Computational Fluid Dynamics and Particle Image Velocimetry Models of Distal-End Side-to-Side and End-to-Side Anastomoses for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a Pulsatile Flow.
    Shintani Y, Iino K, Yamamoto Y, Kato H, Takemura H, Kiwata T.
    Circ J; 2017 Dec 25; 82(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 28824030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. How Computational Modeling can Help to Predict Gas Transfer in Artificial Lungs Early in the Design Process.
    Kaesler A, Rosen M, Schlanstein PC, Wagner G, Groß-Hardt S, Schmitz-Rode T, Steinseifer U, Arens J.
    ASAIO J; 2020 Jun 25; 66(6):683-690. PubMed ID: 31789656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models.
    Ford MD, Nikolov HN, Milner JS, Lownie SP, Demont EM, Kalata W, Loth F, Holdsworth DW, Steinman DA.
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr 25; 130(2):021015. PubMed ID: 18412502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.