These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparative study of the adsorption performance of a multi-sorbent bed (Carbotrap, Carbopack X, Carboxen 569) and a Tenax TA adsorbent tube for the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Gallego E, Roca FJ, Perales JF, Guardino X. Talanta; 2010 May 15; 81(3):916-24. PubMed ID: 20298873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Passive personal sampler for exposure to low concentration of volatile organic compounds]. Xu D, Cui J, Wang B. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 1999 Jul 15; 28(4):246-8. PubMed ID: 11938990 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Pollution characteristics and health risk assessment of atmospheric volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in pesticide factory]. Tan B, Wang TY, Pang B, Zhu ZY, Wang DH, Lü YL. Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Dec 15; 34(12):4577-84. PubMed ID: 24640893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of ozone precursor volatile organic compounds in urban atmospheres and around the petrochemical industry in the Tarragona region. Ras MR, Marcé RM, Borrull F. Sci Total Environ; 2009 Jul 01; 407(14):4312-9. PubMed ID: 19423150 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sorbent-based sampling methods for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds in air Part 1: Sorbent-based air monitoring options. Woolfenden E. J Chromatogr A; 2010 Apr 16; 1217(16):2674-84. PubMed ID: 20106481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation of qualitative and quantitative of volatile organic compounds of ambient air in the Mahshahr Petrochemical Complex in 2009. Maghsoodi Moghadam R, Bahrami A, Ghorbani F, Mahjub H, Malaki D. J Res Health Sci; 2013 May 29; 13(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23772018 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Emission Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Volatile Organic Compounds from Typical Factories in Zhengzhou]. Qi YJ, Ni JW, Zhao DX, Yang Y, Han LY, Li BW. Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2020 Jul 08; 41(7):3056-3065. PubMed ID: 32608877 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sorbent-based sampling methods for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds in air. Part 2. Sorbent selection and other aspects of optimizing air monitoring methods. Woolfenden E. J Chromatogr A; 2010 Apr 16; 1217(16):2685-94. PubMed ID: 20106482 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Extent of sample loss on the sampling device and the resulting experimental biases when collecting volatile fatty acids (VFAs) in air using sorbent tubes. Kim YH, Kim KH. Anal Chem; 2013 Aug 20; 85(16):7818-25. PubMed ID: 23869450 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 24 h averaged VOC monitoring results for residential indoor and outdoor air using Carbopack X-filled diffusive samplers and active sampling--a pilot study. McClenny WA, Jacumin HH, Oliver KD, Daughtrey EH, Whitaker DA. J Environ Monit; 2006 Feb 20; 8(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 16470258 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A field comparison of volatile organic compound measurements using passive organic vapor monitors and stainless steel canisters. Pratt GC, Bock D, Stock TH, Morandi M, Adgate JL, Ramachandran G, Mongin SJ, Sexton K. Environ Sci Technol; 2005 May 01; 39(9):3261-8. PubMed ID: 15926577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of three types of passive samplers for measuring 1,3-butadiene and benzene at workplaces. Strandberg B, Bergemalm-Rynell K, Sallsten G. Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 May 01; 16(5):1008-14. PubMed ID: 24585324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]