These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

260 related items for PubMed ID: 26601603

  • 1. Reducing needlestick injuries through safety-engineered devices: results of a Japanese multi-centre study.
    Fukuda H, Yamanaka N.
    J Hosp Infect; 2016 Feb; 92(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 26601603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Safety-Engineered Devices.
    Fukuda H, Moriwaki K.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 37(9):1012-21. PubMed ID: 27226284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Do safety engineered devices reduce needlestick injuries?
    Schuurmans J, Lutgens SP, Groen L, Schneeberger PM.
    J Hosp Infect; 2018 Sep; 100(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 29738783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Needlestick injury rates according to different types of safety-engineered devices: results of a French multicenter study.
    Tosini W, Ciotti C, Goyer F, Lolom I, L'Hériteau F, Abiteboul D, Pellissier G, Bouvet E.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 31(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 20175681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Needlestick injuries in a major teaching hospital: the worthwhile effect of hospital-wide replacement of conventional hollow-bore needles.
    Whitby M, McLaws ML, Slater K.
    Am J Infect Control; 2008 Apr; 36(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 18371513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.
    Reddy VK, Lavoie MC, Verbeek JH, Pahwa M.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov 14; 11(11):CD009740. PubMed ID: 29190036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy-comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices.
    Ottino MC, Argentero A, Argentero PA, Garzaro G, Zotti CM.
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov 19; 9(11):e030576. PubMed ID: 31748292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Role of safety-engineered devices in preventing needlestick injuries in 32 French hospitals.
    Lamontagne F, Abiteboul D, Lolom I, Pellissier G, Tarantola A, Descamps JM, Bouvet E.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Jan 19; 28(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 17230383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Device-specific risk of needlestick injury in Italian health care workers.
    Ippolito G, De Carli G, Puro V, Petrosillo N, Arici C, Bertucci R, Bianciardi L, Bonazzi L, Cestrone A, Daglio M.
    JAMA; 2007 Jan 19; 272(8):607-10. PubMed ID: 8057516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Causes of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries When Using Devices with and without Safety Features.
    Dulon M, Stranzinger J, Wendeler D, Nienhaus A.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov 24; 17(23):. PubMed ID: 33255337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of a safety resheathable winged steel needle for prevention of percutaneous injuries associated with intravascular-access procedures among healthcare workers.
    Mendelson MH, Lin-Chen BY, Solomon R, Bailey E, Kogan G, Goldbold J.
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2003 Feb 24; 24(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 12602692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [The efficacy of safety winged steel needles on needlestick injuries].
    Suzuki R, Kimura S, Shintani Y, Uchida M, Morisawa Y, Okuzumi K, Yoshida A, Suganoy Y, Moriya K, Koike K.
    Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 2006 Jan 24; 80(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 16519123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Economic benefits of safety-engineered sharp devices in Belgium - a budget impact model.
    Hanmore E, Maclaine G, Garin F, Alonso A, Leroy N, Ruff L.
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Nov 25; 13():489. PubMed ID: 24274747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Causes of needlestick injuries in three healthcare settings: analysis of accident notifications registered six months after the implementation of EU Directive 2010/32/EU in Germany.
    Dulon M, Lisiak B, Wendeler D, Nienhaus A.
    J Hosp Infect; 2017 Mar 25; 95(3):306-311. PubMed ID: 28034473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Device-specific rates of needlestick injury at a large military teaching hospital.
    Nevin RL, Carbonell I, Thurmond V.
    Am J Infect Control; 2008 Dec 25; 36(10):750-2. PubMed ID: 18834746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Hollow-bore needlestick injuries in a tertiary teaching hospital: epidemiology, education and engineering.
    Whitby RM, McLaws ML.
    Med J Aust; 2002 Oct 21; 177(8):418-22. PubMed ID: 12381250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Needlestick injuries among nurses of Fars province, Iran.
    Askarian M, Shaghaghian S, McLaws ML.
    Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Dec 21; 17(12):988-92. PubMed ID: 17923420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Incidence rate of needlestick and sharps injuries in 67 Japanese hospitals: a national surveillance study.
    Yoshikawa T, Wada K, Lee JJ, Mitsuda T, Kidouchi K, Kurosu H, Morisawa Y, Aminaka M, Okubo T, Kimura S, Moriya K.
    PLoS One; 2013 Dec 21; 8(10):e77524. PubMed ID: 24204856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Needlestick and sharps injuries in a tertiary hospital in the Republic of Korea.
    Park S, Jeong I, Huh J, Yoon Y, Lee S, Choi C.
    Am J Infect Control; 2008 Aug 21; 36(6):439-43. PubMed ID: 18675151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.