These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

376 related items for PubMed ID: 26626041

  • 21. Effects of direct oral anticoagulants on lupus anticoagulant assays in a real-life setting.
    Antovic A, Norberg EM, Berndtsson M, Rasmuson A, Malmström RE, Skeppholm M, Antovic J.
    Thromb Haemost; 2017 Aug 30; 117(9):1700-1704. PubMed ID: 28640321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Letter to the editors-in-chief: Gender differences in the dilute Russell's viper venom time lupus anticoagulant test.
    Johnsen SJA, Skadberg Ø, Svendsen KN, Åsberg A.
    Thromb Res; 2022 Jul 30; 215():52-54. PubMed ID: 35640514
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Sensitivity of the activated partial thromboplastin time, the dilute Russell's viper venom time, and the kaolin clotting time for the detection of the lupus anticoagulant: a direct comparison using plasma dilutions.
    Martin BA, Branch DW, Rodgers GM.
    Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 1996 Jan 30; 7(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 8845460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The dilute Russell's viper venom time.
    Radhakrishnan K.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013 Jan 30; 992():341-8. PubMed ID: 23546726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Mixing studies for lupus anticoagulant: mostly no, sometimes yes.
    Moore GW.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2020 Mar 26; 58(4):492-495. PubMed ID: 31874095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Is lupus anticoagulant testing with dilute Russell's viper venom clotting times reliable in the presence of inflammation?
    Hardy M, Catry E, Pouplard M, Lecompte T, Mullier F.
    Res Pract Thromb Haemost; 2024 Aug 26; 8(6):102536. PubMed ID: 39290988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Effect of residual platelets in frozen-thawed plasma on results of dilute Russell's viper venom time assay for lupus anticoagulant testing.
    Nelson Strande BJ, Sridharan M, Leger RR, Stuart MS, Tange JI, Navitska SD, Heikal N, Ashrani AA, Chen D, Seheult JN, Pruthi RK.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2024 Mar 01; 161(3):212-215. PubMed ID: 37878771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Dilute Russell's viper venom time reagents in lupus anticoagulant testing: a well-considered choice.
    Depreter B, Devreese KM.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Jan 01; 55(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 27331311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Reference ranges of the dilute tissue thromboplastin inhibition and dilute Russell's viper venom tests revisited.
    Gerbutavicius R, Fareed J, Messmore HL, Iqbal O, Wehrmacher WH, Hoppensteadt DA, Demir M, Piccolo P, Ahmad S, Ma Q, Griniute R.
    Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2002 Jan 01; 8(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11991240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The dilution effect of equal volume mixing studies compromises confirmation of inhibition by lupus anticoagulants even when mixture specific reference ranges are applied.
    Moore GW, Savidge GF.
    Thromb Res; 2006 Jan 01; 118(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 16263154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The Taipan snake venom time: a new test for lupus anticoagulant.
    Rooney AM, McNally T, Mackie IJ, Machin SJ.
    J Clin Pathol; 1994 Jun 01; 47(6):497-501. PubMed ID: 8063928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Recombinant thromboplastin inhibition assay for the detection of lupus anticoagulant.
    Zanon E, Saracino MA, Simioni P, Scarano L, Girolami B, Girolami A.
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1995 Sep 01; 17(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 8719896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Further evidence of false negative screening for lupus anticoagulants.
    Moore GW, Henley A, Greenwood CK, Rangarajan S.
    Thromb Res; 2008 Sep 01; 121(4):477-84. PubMed ID: 17602725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Lupus Anticoagulant Testing: Dilute Prothrombin Time (dPT).
    Moore GW.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023 Sep 01; 2663():275-288. PubMed ID: 37204717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Validation of mixing test-specific cut-off in lupus anticoagulant mixing test interpretation for multiple reagents.
    Kumano O, Moore GW.
    Thromb Res; 2023 Nov 01; 231():39-43. PubMed ID: 37801773
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The effect of DOAC-Stop on lupus anticoagulant testing in plasma samples of venous thromboembolism patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants.
    Ząbczyk M, Kopytek M, Natorska J, Undas A.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Aug 27; 57(9):1374-1381. PubMed ID: 30763261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Use of a simplified dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT) confirms heterogeneity among 'lupus anticoagulants'.
    Exner T, Papadopoulos G, Koutts J.
    Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 1990 Aug 27; 1(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 2129412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Lupus anticoagulant testing using two parallel methods detects additional cases and predicts persistent positivity.
    Simmons DP, Herskovits AZ, Battinelli EM, Schur PH, Lemire SJ, Dorfman DM.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2018 Jul 26; 56(8):1289-1296. PubMed ID: 27305702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Lupus anticoagulant laboratory diagnosis by applying the 2020 ISTH-SSC guidelines.
    Talon L, Fourneyron V, Senectaire S, Tardieu M, Tillier M, Trapani A, Trayaud A, Vaissade A, Sapin AF, Lebreton A, Sinegre T.
    Thromb Res; 2023 Apr 26; 224():38-45. PubMed ID: 36827954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A lupus anticoagulant neutralization procedure using the patient's own platelets.
    Carroll P, Ray M, Just S, Hawson G.
    Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 1994 Aug 26; 5(4):523-7. PubMed ID: 7841308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.