These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

184 related items for PubMed ID: 26627469

  • 1. Distribution Characteristics of Air-Bone Gaps: Evidence of Bias in Manual Audiometry.
    Margolis RH, Wilson RH, Popelka GR, Eikelboom RH, Swanepoel de W, Saly GL.
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 26627469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E, Keidser G, Seeto M, Freeston K, Zhou D, Dillon H.
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. How to eliminate air-bone gaps audiometrically: use too much masking.
    Miller MH.
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2008 May; 87(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 18572783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR, Prieve BA, Georgantas LM.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy and precision of direct bone conduction measurements.
    Sadeghi AM, Flynn M, Davison T, Schulte M, Hillbratt M.
    B-ENT; 2016 Jun; 12(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 27097393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss.
    De Sousa KC, Smits C, Moore DR, Myburgh HC, Swanepoel W.
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):801-808. PubMed ID: 32609044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap.
    de Wolf MJ, Hendrix S, Cremers CW, Snik AF.
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Mar; 121(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 21344443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Automated hearing tests: applying the otogram to patients who are difficult to test.
    Yu J, Ostevik A, Hodgetts B, Ho A.
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Oct; 40(5):376-83. PubMed ID: 22420392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. AMTAS(®): automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: III. sensorineural hearing loss and air-bone gaps.
    Margolis RH, Moore BC.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):440-7. PubMed ID: 21668325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Distribution of hearing loss characteristics in a clinical population.
    Margolis RH, Saly GL.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 18600134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Distribution characteristics of normal pure-tone thresholds.
    Margolis RH, Wilson RH, Popelka GR, Eikelboom RH, Swanepoel de W, Saly GL.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Aug; 54(11):796-805. PubMed ID: 25938502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Ihler F, Volbers L, Blum J, Matthias C, Canis M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 24448279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Patterns of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation resulting from physical blow to the ear: a prospective controlled cohort study.
    Orji FT, Agu CC.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 20070761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Diagnostic Hearing Assessment in Schools: Validity and Time Efficiency of Automated Audiometry.
    Mahomed-Asmail F, Swanepoel de W, Eikelboom RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 26809325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The masking dilemma and its solution. Fusion at the inferred threshold (FIT) and sensorineural acuity level (SAL) tests.
    Chaplin RG, Miyamoto RT.
    Am J Otol; 1983 Jul; 5(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 6881307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Multiple auditory steady state response thresholds to bone conduction stimuli in adults with normal and elevated thresholds.
    Ishida IM, Cuthbert BP, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Jul; 32(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 21206364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of the Conductive Component of Hearing Loss on Speech Discrimination Ability.
    Kurioka T, Sano H, Furuki S, Yamashita T.
    J Int Adv Otol; 2020 Apr; 16(1):93-97. PubMed ID: 32209519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Automated Smartphone Audiometry: A Preliminary Validation of a Bone-Conduction Threshold Test App.
    Dewyer NA, Jiradejvong P, Lee DS, Kemmer JD, Henderson Sabes J, Limb CJ.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2019 Jun; 128(6):508-515. PubMed ID: 30744390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Estimating air-bone gaps using auditory steady-state responses.
    Jeng FC, Brownt CJ, Johnson TA, Vander Werff KR.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 Jan; 15(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 15030102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Surgical findings and long-term hearing results in 3,050 stapedotomies for primary otosclerosis: a prospective study with the otology-neurotology database.
    Vincent R, Sperling NM, Oates J, Jindal M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8 Suppl 2):S25-47. PubMed ID: 16985478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.