These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
111 related items for PubMed ID: 26637253
41. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation. Stiesch-Scholz M, Hannig M. J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations. Setien VJ, Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA. Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Influence of flowable composite and restorative technique on microleakage of class II restorations. Hernandes NM, Catelan A, Soares GP, Ambrosano GM, Lima DA, Marchi GM, Martins LR, Aguiar FH. J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 23946230 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of the cervical integrity during occlusal loading of Class II restorations. Campos PE, Barceleiro Mde O, Sampaio-Filho HR, Martins LR. Oper Dent; 2008 Nov; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18335734 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Effect of remaining demineralised dentine on dental microleakage accessed by a dye penetration: how to inhibit microleakage? Piemjai M, Watanabe A, Iwasaki Y, Nakabayashi N. J Dent; 2004 Aug; 32(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 15240068 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of total-etch, self-etch, and selective etching techniques on class V composite restorations prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur: a scanning electron microscopy study. Ozel E, Tuna EB, Firatli S, Firatli E. Microsc Res Tech; 2016 Oct; 79(10):998-1004. PubMed ID: 27472905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. A comparative microleakage evaluation of three different base materials in Class I cavity in deciduous molars in sandwich technique using dye penetration and dentin surface interface by scanning electron microscope. Niranjan B, Shashikiran ND, Singla S, Thakur R, Dubey A, Maran S. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016 Oct; 34(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 27681395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Handpieces for Class II Preparation and Microleakage of Silorane- or Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations. Ergin E, Oz FD, Gurgan S. Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Sep; 36(9):499-505. PubMed ID: 30188252 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Microleakage of amalgam cavity treatment systems: an in vitro evaluation. Morrow LA, Wilson NH, Setcos JC, Watts DC. Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 12572646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Microleakage and microtensile bond strength of silorane-based and dimethacrylate-based restorative systems. Santos MJ, Podorieszach A, Rizkalla AS, Santos GC. Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Aug; 34 Spec No 8():19-24. PubMed ID: 24568172 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures. Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL. Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 10649934 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Chuang SF, Jin YT, Tsai PF, Wong TY. J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Effect of dentin deproteinization on microleakage of Class V composite restorations. Toledano M, Perdigão J, Osorio R, Osorio E. Oper Dent; 2000 Sep; 25(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 11203862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Microleakage of composite restorations with Syntac Bond and Denthesive. Saunders WP, Muirhead JM. Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):255-7. PubMed ID: 1299251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The effect of antimicrobial pre-treatments on the performance of resin composite restorations. Owens BM, Lim DY, Arheart KL. Oper Dent; 2003 Oct; 28(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 14653285 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results. Neme AL, Evans DB, Maxson BB. Oper Dent; 2000 Oct; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume. da Silva AF, Piva E, Demarco FF, Correr Sobrinho L, Osinga PW. Oper Dent; 2006 Oct; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Influence of an intermediary base on the microleakage of simulated class II composite resin restorations. Giorgi MC, Hernandes NM, Sugii MM, Ambrosano GM, Marchi GM, Lima DA, Aguiar FH. Oper Dent; 2014 Oct; 39(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 23937406 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of Microleakage of Nanoionomer and Nanocomposite Restorations, immersed in Fruit Drink, Fresh Fruit Juice and Soft Drink--An in vitro Study. Katge F, Shitoot A, Pammi T, Mithiborwala S. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016 Oct; 40(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 26950814 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Microleakage in different primary tooth restorations. Shih WY. J Chin Med Assoc; 2016 Apr; 79(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 26839288 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]