These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements. Amoore JN, Lemesre Y, Murray IC, Mieke S, King ST, Smith FE, Murray A. J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of portable noninvasive blood pressure monitoring devices: comparisons with intra-arterial and sphygmomanometer measurements. Graettinger WF, Lipson JL, Cheung DG, Weber MA. Am Heart J; 1988 Oct; 116(4):1155-60. PubMed ID: 3177191 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements. Amoore JN, Vacher E, Murray IC, Mieke S, King ST, Smith FE, Murray A. Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods. Weaver MG, Park MK, Lee DH. Am J Dis Child; 1990 Aug; 144(8):911-4. PubMed ID: 2378339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital recording system of sphygmomanometry. Lee J, Park D, Oh H, Kim I, Shen D, Chee Y. Blood Press Monit; 2009 Apr; 14(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19305187 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models. Sims AJ, Reay CA, Bousfield DR, Menes JA, Murray A. J Med Eng Technol; 2005 Apr; 29(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 16019880 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring arterial blood pressure in humans: Auscultatory and automatic measurement techniques for human biological field studies. James GD, Gerber LM. Am J Hum Biol; 2018 Jan; 30(1):. PubMed ID: 28940503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices? Amoore JN, Vacher E, Murray IC, Mieke S, King ST, Smith FE, Murray A. Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of oscillometric and Doppler ultrasonic devices for blood pressure measurements in anesthetized and conscious dogs. Vachon C, Belanger MC, Burns PM. Res Vet Sci; 2014 Aug; 97(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 24924217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation Between Blood Pressure Measurement by Non-invasive and Invasive Methods in Critically-ill Children. Krishna BV, Das S, Sen S. Indian Pediatr; 2018 Apr 15; 55(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 29428917 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the accuracy of non-invasive automatic blood pressure monitors. Kawahara M. Anesth Prog; 1990 Apr 15; 37(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 2096748 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]