These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Digital subtraction radiography for diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions with simulated high-speed systems. Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG, Webber RL. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Mar; 55(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 6340021 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of variations in projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions. A comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic technique. Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG, Webber RL. J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Jul; 11(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 6378985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Problems around the in vitro and in vivo application of quantitative digital subtraction radiography. Janssen PT, van Aken J. J Clin Periodontol; 1989 May; 16(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 2656771 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Subtraction radiography of interradicular bone lesions. Kullendorff B, Gröndahl K, Rohlin M, Nilsson M. Acta Odontol Scand; 1992 Oct; 50(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 1441929 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Subtraction radiography for the diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions. Gröndahl HG, Gröndahl K. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Feb; 55(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 6340017 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain. Chai-U-Dom O, Ludlow JB, Tyndall DA, Webber RL. J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region. Tyndall DA, Kapa SF, Bagnell CP. J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dried human mandibles. Rawlinson A, Ellwood RP, Davies RM. J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 10100038 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions. Parsell DE, Gatewood RS, Watts JD, Streckfus CF. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Oct; 86(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 9798239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital subtraction of radiograph in evaluating alveolar bone changes after initial periodontal therapy. Okano T, Mera T, Ohki M, Ishikawa I, Yamada N. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Feb; 69(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 2406677 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital imaging in periodontal radiography. A review. Brägger U. J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Oct; 15(9):551-7. PubMed ID: 3058754 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]