These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

514 related items for PubMed ID: 26685634

  • 1. ORTHODONTIC RETENTION. Studies of retention capacity, cost-effectiveness and long-term stability.
    Tynelius GE.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2014; (236):9-65. PubMed ID: 26685634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. No differences seen in outcomes between three different methods of orthodontic retention.
    Walker M.
    Evid Based Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):81-2. PubMed ID: 24071676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A randomized controlled trial of three orthodontic retention methods in Class I four premolar extraction cases -- stability after 2 years in retention.
    Edman Tynelius G, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 May; 16(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 23324112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment after 1 year of retention--a randomized controlled trial.
    Edman Tynelius G, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E.
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):542-7. PubMed ID: 20080961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. FIXED OR REMOVABLE APPLIANCE FOR EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANTERIOR CROSSBITE.
    Wiedel AP.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2015 Oct; (238):10-72. PubMed ID: 26939312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Five-year postretention outcomes of three retention methods--a randomized controlled trial.
    Edman Tynelius G, Petrén S, Bondemark L, Lilja-Karlander E.
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 25452629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Orthodontic retention--three methods trialed.
    Cope JF, Lamont T.
    Evid Based Dent; 2016 Mar; 17(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 27012577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A cost-minimization analysis of an RCT of three retention methods.
    Tynelius GE, Lilja-Karlander E, Petrén S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 24084630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cost analysis of two types of fixed maxillary retainers and a removable vacuum-formed maxillary retainer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sonesson M, Naraghi S, Bondemark L.
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar 30; 44(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 35021204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome in relation to retention status: An 8-year follow-up.
    Steinnes J, Johnsen G, Kerosuo H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun 30; 151(6):1027-1033. PubMed ID: 28554448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Stability of maxillary anterior teeth after 2 years of retention in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial comparing two bonded and a vacuum-formed retainer.
    Naraghi S, Ganzer N, Bondemark L, Sonesson M.
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr 03; 43(2):152-158. PubMed ID: 33351886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Stability of maxillary anterior teeth during retention and 1 year after removal of retention-an RCT on adolescents retained with two different bonded retainers and a vacuum-formed retainer.
    Naraghi S, Ganzer N, Bondemark L, Sonesson M.
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Nov 30; 45(6):629-636. PubMed ID: 37119264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months.
    Forde K, Storey M, Littlewood SJ, Scott P, Luther F, Kang J.
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul 27; 40(4):387-398. PubMed ID: 29059289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers.
    Renkema AM, Renkema A, Bronkhorst E, Katsaros C.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May 27; 139(5):614-21. PubMed ID: 21536204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The origin and evolution of the Hawley retainer for the effectiveness to maintain tooth position after fixed orthodontic treatment compare to vacuum-formed retainer: A systematic review of RCTs.
    Outhaisavanh S, Liu Y, Song J.
    Int Orthod; 2020 Jun 27; 18(2):225-236. PubMed ID: 32201168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Factors affecting stability after fixed orthodontic treatment].
    Ren SS, Dai X, Ying M, Wang WX, Chang J, Hou ZM.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Sep 09; 53(9):599-603. PubMed ID: 30196619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Which orthodontic retention protocol should I implement? A critical assessment of a randomised controlled trial.
    Steegmans PAJ, Cavagnetto D, Reynders RAM.
    Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec 09; 23(4):162-165. PubMed ID: 36526846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Post-treatment stability after 5 years of retention with vacuum-formed and bonded retainers-a randomized controlled trial.
    Krämer A, Sjöström M, Apelthun C, Hallman M, Feldmann I.
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Feb 10; 45(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 35968668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.