These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
144 related items for PubMed ID: 26696109
21. Development of a Cavity Disinfectant Containing Antibacterial Monomer MDPB. Hirose N, Kitagawa R, Kitagawa H, Maezono H, Mine A, Hayashi M, Haapasalo M, Imazato S. J Dent Res; 2016 Dec; 95(13):1487-1493. PubMed ID: 27558263 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Antibacterial effect of diode laser on different cariogenic bacteria: An In-vitro study. Vinothkumar TS, Apathsakayan R, M El-Shamy FM, Homeida HE, Hommedi AIM, A Safhi MY, Alsalhi HAM. Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Nov; 23(11):1578-1582. PubMed ID: 33221785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of a papain-based gel for chemomechanical caries removal on dentin shear bond strength. Lopes MC, Mascarini RC, da Silva BM, Flório FM, Basting RT. J Dent Child (Chic); 2007 Nov; 74(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 18477426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Antibacterial activity of various self-etching adhesive systems against oral streptococci. Esteves CM, Ota-Tsuzuki C, Reis AF, Rodrigues JA. Oper Dent; 2010 Nov; 35(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 20672730 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. TiF4 Incorporated into a Self-etching Primer in Different Concentrations: Antimicrobial Properties and Effects on Demineralisation Inhibition Around the Restoration/Enamel-Dentin Interface. Abbatepaulo GL, Gangana TMMC, Martinez EF, Turssi CP, França FMG, Amaral FLB, Basting RT. Oral Health Prev Dent; 2019 Nov; 17(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 30793123 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Does the method of caries induction influence the bond strength to dentin of primary teeth? Lenzi TL, Tedesco TK, Calvo AF, Ricci HA, Hebling J, Raggio DP. J Adhes Dent; 2014 Aug; 16(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 24669367 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of a novel quaternary ammonium methacrylate polymer (QAMP) on adhesion and antibacterial properties of dental adhesives. Pupo YM, Farago PV, Nadal JM, Simão LC, Esmerino LA, Gomes OM, Gomes JC. Int J Mol Sci; 2014 May 20; 15(5):8998-9015. PubMed ID: 24853131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Antibacterial Effect of Surface Pretreatment Techniques against Streptococcus Mutans. Sancakli HS, Siso SH, Yildiz SO, Gökçe YB. Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Feb 20; 21(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 29465050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. In situ assessment of effects of the bromide- and fluoride-incorporating adhesive systems on biofilm and secondary caries. Vasconcelos SM, Melo MA, Wenceslau JP, Zanin IC, Beltrao HC, Fernandes CA, Almeida PC, Rodrigues LK. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Mar 01; 15(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 25095833 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Antibacterial activity and bonding characteristics of an adhesive resin containing antibacterial monomer MDPB. Imazato S, Kinomoto Y, Tarumi H, Ebisu S, Tay FR. Dent Mater; 2003 Jun 01; 19(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 12686296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro study of the antibacterial properties and microbial colonization susceptibility of four self-etching adhesives used in orthodontics. Jacobo C, Torrella F, Bravo-González LA, Ortiz AJ, Vicente A. Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr 01; 36(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 23720449 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials. Baghalian A, Nakhjavani YB, Hooshmand T, Motahhary P, Bahramian H. Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov 01; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Zinc oxide and copper nanoparticles addition in universal adhesive systems improve interface stability on caries-affected dentin. Gutiérrez MF, Bermudez J, Dávila-Sánchez A, Alegría-Acevedo LF, Méndez-Bauer L, Hernández M, Astorga J, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Farago PV, Fernández E. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec 01; 100():103366. PubMed ID: 31422314 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites. Cal E, Türkün LS, Türkün M, Toman M, Toksavul S. J Dent; 2006 Jul 01; 34(6):372-80. PubMed ID: 16288949 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Antibacterial activity of different generation dentin-bonding systems. Başeren M, Yazici AR, Ozalp M, Dayangaç B. Quintessence Int; 2005 May 01; 36(5):339-44. PubMed ID: 15892530 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Is an antibacterial adhesive system more effective than cavity disinfectants? Türkün M, Türkün LS, Ergücü Z, Ateş M. Am J Dent; 2006 Jun 01; 19(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 16838482 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of Papain and Bromelain Enzymes on Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Superficial Dentin in Different Adhesive Systems. Sharafeddin F, Safari M. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Sep 01; 20(9):1077-1081. PubMed ID: 31797833 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The impact of a-tomatine on shear bonding strength in different dentin types and on cariogenic microorganisms: an in vitro and in silico study. Ucuncu MK, Ucuncu MY, Topcuoglu N, Kitin E, Yazicioglu O, Ortaakarsu AB, Aydın M, Erol A. BMC Oral Health; 2024 Oct 14; 24(1):1220. PubMed ID: 39402520 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Antimicrobial properties and cytotoxicity of an antimicrobial monomer for application in prosthodontics. Regis RR, Della Vecchia MP, Pizzolitto AC, Compagnoni MA, Souza PP, de Souza RF. J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun 14; 21(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 22339776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]