These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
181 related items for PubMed ID: 26700998
1. Accuracy of hysteroscopic biopsy, compared to dilation and curettage, as a predictor of final pathology in patients with endometrial cancer. Su H, Huang L, Huang KG, Yen CF, Han CM, Lee CL. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 54(6):757-60. PubMed ID: 26700998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy accuracy in patients with FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma. Leitao MM, Kehoe S, Barakat RR, Alektiar K, Gattoc LP, Rabbitt C, Chi DS, Soslow RA, Abu-Rustum NR. Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 19167049 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of assessing dilation and curettage vs frozen section specimens for histologic grade and depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma. Wang X, Zhang H, Di W, Li W. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Aug; 201(2):194.e1-194.e10. PubMed ID: 19564019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling diagnosis for predicting the final pathology grading in uterine endometrioid carcinoma. Batista TP, Cavalcanti CL, Tejo AA, Bezerra AL. Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1367-71. PubMed ID: 27052799 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy in predicting final histopathologic grade in endometrial cancer. Larson DM, Johnson KK, Broste SK, Krawisz BR, Kresl JJ. Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 7784020 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of preoperative curettage in determining tumor type and grade in endometrial cancer. Thanachaiviwat A, Thirapakawong C, Leelaphatanadit C, Chuangsuwanich T. J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Jul; 94(7):766-71. PubMed ID: 21774280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Endometrial sampling diagnosis of FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma with a background of complex atypical hyperplasia and final hysterectomy pathology. Leitao MM, Kehoe S, Barakat RR, Alektiar K, Rabbitt C, Chi DS, Soslow RA, Abu-Rustum NR. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 202(3):278.e1-6. PubMed ID: 20022581 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical staging for patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial carcinoma. Ben-Shachar I, Pavelka J, Cohn DE, Copeland LJ, Ramirez N, Manolitsas T, Fowler JM. Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):487-93. PubMed ID: 15738013 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Aspiration biopsy versus dilatation and curettage for endometrial hyperplasia prior to hysterectomy. Hwang WY, Suh DH, Kim K, No JH, Kim YB. Diagn Pathol; 2021 Jan 14; 16(1):7. PubMed ID: 33441173 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of D&C and hysterectomy pathologic findings in endometrial cancer patients. Wang X, Huang Z, Di W, Lin Q. Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Jul 14; 272(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 15666177 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling diagnosis of FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma. Leitao MM, Kehoe S, Barakat RR, Alektiar K, Gattoc LP, Rabbitt C, Chi DS, Soslow RA, Abu-Rustum NR. Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov 14; 111(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 18752842 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of tumor grade by preoperative curettage and associated clinicopathologic factors in clinical stage I endometriod adenocarcinoma. Wang XY, Pan ZM, Chen XD, Lü WG, Xie X. Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Aug 20; 122(16):1843-6. PubMed ID: 19781357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of dilatation & curettage and endometrial aspiration biopsy accuracy in patients treated with high-dose oral progestin plus levonorgestrel intrauterine system for early-stage endometrial cancer. Kim MK, Seong SJ, Song T, Kim ML, Yoon BS, Jun HS, Lee GH, Lee YH. Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Sep 20; 130(3):470-3. PubMed ID: 23822890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical stage, final grade, and survival of women with endometrial carcinoma whose preoperative endometrial biopsy shows well-differentiated tumors. Eltabbakh GH, Shamonki J, Mount SL. Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Nov 20; 99(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 16005945 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Endometrial cancer in patients with preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Merisio C, Berretta R, De Ioris A, Pultrone DC, Rolla M, Giordano G, Tateo S, Melpignano M. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Sep 01; 122(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 16154046 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The diagnostic value of dilatation and curettage in endometrial carcinoma]. Tiufekchieva E, Slavchev B, Maĭnkhard K. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1998 Sep 01; 37(2):33-6. PubMed ID: 9859534 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of final histology in patients with endometrial cancer. Frumovitz M, Singh DK, Meyer L, Smith DH, Wertheim I, Resnik E, Bodurka DC. Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec 01; 95(3):463-8. PubMed ID: 15581947 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma]. Yu XD, Ouyang H, Lin M, Zhou CW, Zhang R. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep 01; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between adenocarcinoma in both endocervical and endometrial specimens from fractional curettage and pathologic findings in subsequent hysterectomy specimens. Tantbirojn P, Triratanachat S, Trivijitsilp P, Niruthisard S. J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep 01; 91(9):1313-7. PubMed ID: 18843857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia: the risk of unrecognized adenocarcinoma and value of preoperative dilation and curettage. Suh-Burgmann E, Hung YY, Armstrong MA. Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep 01; 114(3):523-529. PubMed ID: 19701030 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]