These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
227 related items for PubMed ID: 2671191
1. [Comparative analysis of mechanical and biological prosthetic valves after isolated valve replacement--cooperative study on total 1281 patients]. Nakano S, Kawashima Y, Komatsu S, Sakai K, Eguchi S, Aosaki M, Misaki T, Ohara K, Tokunaga K. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Mar; 37(3):423-30. PubMed ID: 2671191 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biological versus mechanical valves. Analysis of 1,116 valves inserted in 1,012 adult patients with a 4,818 patient-year and a 5,327 valve-year follow-up. Hammond GL, Geha AS, Kopf GS, Hashim SW. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):182-98. PubMed ID: 3807394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical results of pericardial xenograft valves: the Ionescu-Shiley and Hancock valves. Goldman B, Scully H, Tong C, Mandell R, Butany J, Azuma J, Schwartz L. Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 3179796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years. Milano AD, Bortolotti U, Mazzucco A, Guerra F, Magni A, Gallucci V. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease. Hammermeister KE, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Oprian C, Kim T, Rahimtoola S. N Engl J Med; 1993 May 06; 328(18):1289-96. PubMed ID: 8469251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]