These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
457 related items for PubMed ID: 26717051
1. Predictive factors for positive diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures by transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy. Naitoh I, Nakazawa T, Kato A, Hayashi K, Miyabe K, Shimizu S, Kondo H, Nishi Y, Yoshida M, Umemura S, Hori Y, Kuno T, Takahashi S, Ohara H, Joh T. J Dig Dis; 2016 Jan; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 26717051 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. Chen WM, Wei KL, Chen YS, Chang PJ, Tung SY, Chang TS, Huang HC, Shen CH, Hsieh YY, Wu CS. World J Surg Oncol; 2016 May 04; 14():140. PubMed ID: 27142076 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited. Mehmood S, Loya A, Yusuf MA. Acta Cytol; 2016 May 04; 60(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 27221813 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the diagnostic yield of controllable biopsy-forceps for biliary strictures. Inoue T, Kitano R, Kobayashi Y, Ishii N, Sakamoto K, Ohashi T, Nakade Y, Sumida Y, Ito K, Nakao H, Yoneda M. Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 May 04; 53(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 29183203 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Navaneethan U, Njei B, Lourdusamy V, Konjeti R, Vargo JJ, Parsi MA. Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jan 04; 81(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 25440678 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures. Smoczynski M, Jablonska A, Matyskiel A, Lakomy J, Dubowik M, Marek I, Biernat W, Limon J. Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan 04; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting the accuracy of endoscopic transpapillary sampling methods for bile duct cancer. Nishikawa T, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y, Sugiyama H, Tawada K, Mikata R, Tada M, Ishihara T, Miyazaki M, Yokosuka O. Dig Endosc; 2014 Mar 04; 26(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 23826684 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Triple-tissue sampling during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography increases the overall diagnostic sensitivity for cholangiocarcinoma. Lee SJ, Lee YS, Lee MG, Lee SH, Shin E, Hwang JH. Gut Liver; 2014 Nov 04; 8(6):669-73. PubMed ID: 25368755 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Usefulness of transpapillary bile duct brushing cytology and forceps biopsy for improved diagnosis in patients with biliary strictures. Kitajima Y, Ohara H, Nakazawa T, Ando T, Hayashi K, Takada H, Tanaka H, Ogawa K, Sano H, Togawa S, Naito I, Hirai M, Ueno K, Ban T, Miyabe K, Yamashita H, Yoshimura N, Akita S, Gotoh K, Joh T. J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Oct 04; 22(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17573833 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study. Pugliese V, Conio M, Nicolò G, Saccomanno S, Gatteschi B. Gastrointest Endosc; 1995 Dec 04; 42(6):520-6. PubMed ID: 8674921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting the yield of endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy for the diagnosis of pancreatic head cancer. Kimura H, Matsubayashi H, Sasaki K, Ito H, Hirosawa K, Uesaka K, Kanemoto H, Ono H. Pancreatology; 2013 Dec 04; 13(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 24075518 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of single operator cholangioscopy on accuracy of bile duct cytology. Aly FZ, Mostofizadeh S, Jawaid S, Knapik J, Mukhtar F, Klein R. Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Dec 04; 48(12):1230-1236. PubMed ID: 32770823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]