These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
296 related items for PubMed ID: 26719717
21. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using a Novel Hydroxyapatite-Coated Screw: Preliminary 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Results of a 2-Year Prospective Study. Rappoport LH, Luna IY, Joshua G. World Neurosurg; 2017 May; 101():493-497. PubMed ID: 28216399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Fusion and patient-reported outcomes after navigated decortication and direct arthrodesis in minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using cylindrical threaded implants: a case series and literature review. Anton G, Alsalahi A, Yoon EJ, Turnbull J, Dragonette J, Richards B, Tong D, Soo TM. Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jul; 55(1):E2. PubMed ID: 37392775 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study. Duhon BS, Cher DJ, Wine KD, Kovalsky DA, Lockstadt H, SIFI Study Group. Global Spine J; 2016 May; 6(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 27099817 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Ignoring the sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain is costly. Polly DW, Cher D. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2016 May; 8():23-31. PubMed ID: 26855595 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion, Radiofrequency Denervation, and Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: 6-Year Comparative Case Series. Vanaclocha V, Herrera JM, Sáiz-Sapena N, Rivera-Paz M, Verdú-López F. Neurosurgery; 2018 Jan 01; 82(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 28431026 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective Trial of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using 3D-Printed Triangular Titanium Implants. Patel V, Kovalsky D, Meyer SC, Chowdhary A, Lockstadt H, Techy F, Langel C, Limoni R, Yuan PS, Kranenburg A, Cher D, Tender G, Hillen TJ. Med Devices (Auckl); 2020 Jan 01; 13():173-182. PubMed ID: 32607011 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. First clinical results of a novel minimally-invasive fusion system for the sacroiliac joint. Kasapovic A, Schwetje D, Ali T, Jaenisch M, Gathen M, Bornemann R, Abdallah H, Vieweg U. Technol Health Care; 2022 Jan 01; 30(5):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 35342065 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Four-year outcomes after minimally invasive transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion with triangular titanium implants. Darr E, Cher D. Med Devices (Auckl); 2018 Jan 01; 11():287-289. PubMed ID: 30214322 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants versus nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ghaddaf AA, Alsharef JF, Alsharef NK, Alsaegh MH, Alshaban RM, Almutairi AO, Abualola AH, Alshehri MS. Can J Surg; 2024 Jan 01; 67(1):E16-E26. PubMed ID: 38278549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Nonoperative care to manage sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis: high costs and medical resource utilization in the United States Medicare population. Ackerman SJ, Polly DW, Knight T, Holt T, Cummings J. J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Apr 01; 20(4):354-63. PubMed ID: 24527824 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The cost-effectiveness of CT-guided sacroiliac joint injections: a measure of QALY gained. Bydon M, Macki M, De la Garza-Ramos R, Youssef M, Gokaslan ZL, Meleka S, Bydon A. Neurol Res; 2014 Oct 01; 36(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 24773478 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the costs of nonoperative care to minimally invasive surgery for sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis in a United States commercial payer population: potential economic implications of a new minimally invasive technology. Ackerman SJ, Polly DW, Knight T, Schneider K, Holt T, Cummings J. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Oct 01; 6():283-96. PubMed ID: 24904218 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Prospective Trial of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using 3D-Printed Triangular Titanium Implants: 24-Month Follow-Up. Patel V, Kovalsky D, Meyer SC, Chowdhary A, LaCombe J, Lockstadt H, Techy F, Langel C, Limoni R, Yuan P, Kranenburg A, Cher D, Tender G. Med Devices (Auckl); 2021 Oct 01; 14():211-216. PubMed ID: 34234582 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Salvage of Failed Lateral Sacroiliac Joint Fusion with a Novel Posterior Sacroiliac Fusion Device: Diagnostic Approach, Surgical Technique, and Multicenter Case Series. Sayed D, Khatri N, Rupp A, Bovinet C, Azeem N, Li S, Josephson Y, Pope J. J Pain Res; 2022 Oct 01; 15():1411-1420. PubMed ID: 35592816 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Ethnic Differences in Western and Asian Sacroiliac Joint Anatomy for Surgical Planning of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion. Wu C, Liu YC, Koga H, Lee CY, Wang PY, Cher D, Reckling WC, Huang TJ, Wu MH. Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb 25; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 36900027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular implants. Rudolf L, Capobianco R. Open Orthop J; 2014 Feb 25; 8():375-83. PubMed ID: 25352932 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Minimally invasive lateral transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion using 3D-printed triangular titanium implants. Patel V, Kovalsky D, Meyer SC, Chowdhary A, Lockstadt H, Techy F, Billys J, Limoni R, Yuan PS, Kranenburg A, Cher D, Tender G. Med Devices (Auckl); 2019 Feb 25; 12():203-214. PubMed ID: 31239791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial on the effect of local analgesia for pain relief after minimal invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: the ARTEMIS study. Hermans SMM, Nellensteijn JM, van Santbrink H, Knoef R, Reinders MK, Hoofwijk DMN, Potters JW, Movig KLL, Curfs I, van Hemert WLW. BMJ Open; 2021 Dec 20; 11(12):e056204. PubMed ID: 34930745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]