These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

214 related items for PubMed ID: 26721925

  • 1. A Comparison of Two Objective Measures of Binaural Processing: The Interaural Phase Modulation Following Response and the Binaural Interaction Component.
    Haywood NR, Undurraga JA, Marquardt T, McAlpine D.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Interaural frequency mismatch jointly modulates neural brainstem binaural interaction and behavioral interaural time difference sensitivity in humans.
    Sammeth CA, Brown AD, Greene NT, Tollin DJ.
    Hear Res; 2023 Sep 15; 437():108839. PubMed ID: 37429100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.
    Sammeth CA, Greene NT, Brown AD, Tollin DJ.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Sep 15; 42(3):629-643. PubMed ID: 33141776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Aging effects on the binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response in the Mongolian gerbil: Effects of interaural time and level differences.
    Laumen G, Tollin DJ, Beutelmann R, Klump GM.
    Hear Res; 2016 Jul 15; 337():46-58. PubMed ID: 27173973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of interaural time and level differences on the binaural interaction component of the 80 Hz auditory steady-state response.
    Zhang F, Boettcher FA.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jan 15; 19(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 18637411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Suitability of the Binaural Interaction Component for Interaural Electrode Pairing of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H, Kollmeier B, Dietz M.
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016 Jan 15; 894():57-64. PubMed ID: 27080646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Neural Representation of Interaural Time Differences in Humans-an Objective Measure that Matches Behavioural Performance.
    Undurraga JA, Haywood NR, Marquardt T, McAlpine D.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Dec 15; 17(6):591-607. PubMed ID: 27628539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
    He S, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Dec 15; 33(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 21730858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Objective Measures of Neural Processing of Interaural Time Differences.
    McAlpine D, Haywood N, Undurraga J, Marquardt T.
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016 Dec 15; 894():197-205. PubMed ID: 27080660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of interaural frequency difference on binaural fusion evidenced by electrophysiological versus psychoacoustical measures.
    Zhou J, Durrant JD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep 15; 114(3):1508-15. PubMed ID: 14514204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Age-Related Deficits in Electrophysiological and Behavioral Measures of Binaural Temporal Processing.
    Koerner TK, Muralimanohar RK, Gallun FJ, Billings CJ.
    Front Neurosci; 2020 Sep 15; 14():578566. PubMed ID: 33192263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study.
    Van Yper LN, Vermeire K, De Vel EF, Battmer RD, Dhooge IJ.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr 15; 126(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 25240247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Physiological Basis and Clinical Use of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.
    Laumen G, Ferber AT, Klump GM, Tollin DJ.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Apr 15; 37(5):e276-e290. PubMed ID: 27232077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. II. Characteristic delays and comparison with responses in the medial superior olive.
    Joris PX.
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Oct 15; 76(4):2137-56. PubMed ID: 8899590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H, Dietz M.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 01; 19():. PubMed ID: 26631108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Between-ear sound frequency disparity modulates a brain stem biomarker of binaural hearing.
    Brown AD, Anbuhl KL, Gilmer JI, Tollin DJ.
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Sep 01; 122(3):1110-1122. PubMed ID: 31314646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The influence of externalization and spatial cues on the generation of auditory brainstem responses and middle latency responses.
    Junius D, Riedel H, Kollmeier B.
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar 01; 225(1-2):91-104. PubMed ID: 17270375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Test-Retest Reliability of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Auditory Brainstem Response.
    Ferber AT, Benichoux V, Tollin DJ.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Mar 01; 37(5):e291-301. PubMed ID: 27232069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Origin of the binaural interaction component in wave P4 of the short-latency auditory evoked potentials in the cat: evaluation of serial depth recordings from the brainstem.
    Ungan P, Yagcioglu S.
    Hear Res; 2002 May 01; 167(1-2):81-101. PubMed ID: 12117533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Investigating the optimal stimulus to evoke the binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response.
    Owrutsky ZL, Peacock J, Tollin DJ.
    Hear Res; 2023 Dec 01; 440():108896. PubMed ID: 37924633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.