These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

192 related items for PubMed ID: 26723365

  • 21. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
    Lenarz T, James C, Cuda D, Fitzgerald O'Connor A, Frachet B, Frijns JH, Klenzner T, Laszig R, Manrique M, Marx M, Merkus P, Mylanus EA, Offeciers E, Pesch J, Ramos-Macias A, Robier A, Sterkers O, Uziel A.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
    Oxenham AJ, Kreft HA.
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct 13; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y, Escabí M, Litovsky RY.
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug 13; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The role of continuous low-frequency harmonicity cues for interrupted speech perception in bimodal hearing.
    Oh SH, Donaldson GS, Kong YY.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr 13; 139(4):1747. PubMed ID: 27106322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
    Marcrum SC, Picou EM, Steffens T.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar 13; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.
    Mc Laughlin M, Reilly RB, Zeng FG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar 13; 133(3):1546-60. PubMed ID: 23464025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Speech recognition outcomes following bilateral cochlear implantation in adults aged over 50 years old.
    Boisvert I, McMahon CM, Dowell RC.
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Mar 13; 55 Suppl 2():S39-44. PubMed ID: 27049835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Binaural hearing with electrical stimulation.
    Kan A, Litovsky RY.
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr 13; 322():127-37. PubMed ID: 25193553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Simulating the effect of interaural mismatch in the insertion depth of bilateral cochlear implants on speech perception.
    van Besouw RM, Forrester L, Crowe ND, Rowan D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug 13; 134(2):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23927131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The effect of presentation level and stimulation rate on speech perception and modulation detection for cochlear implant users.
    Brochier T, McDermott HJ, McKay CM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun 13; 141(6):4097. PubMed ID: 28618807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Blind binary masking for reverberation suppression in cochlear implants.
    Hazrati O, Lee J, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar 13; 133(3):1607-14. PubMed ID: 23464030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Assessment of speech recognition abilities in quiet and in noise: a comparison between self-administered home testing and testing in the clinic for adult cochlear implant users.
    de Graaff F, Huysmans E, Merkus P, Theo Goverts S, Smits C.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov 13; 57(11):872-880. PubMed ID: 30261772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.