These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


571 related items for PubMed ID: 26725102

  • 1. Comparison of the Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Drug-Eluting Balloons in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis (from the RIBS IV and V Randomized Clinical Trials).
    Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, García Del Blanco B, García-Touchard A, Masotti M, López-Minguez JR, Iñiguez A, Zueco J, Velazquez M, Cequier A, Lázaro-García R, Martí V, Moris C, Urbano-Carrillo C, Bastante T, Rivero F, Cárdenas A, Gonzalo N, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Fernández C, Restenosis Intra-Stent: Drug-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent (RIBS-IV and V Studies) Investigators (Under the auspices of the Interventional Cardiology Working Group of the Spanish Society of Cardiology).
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 Feb 15; 117(4):546-554. PubMed ID: 26725102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A Randomized Comparison of Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of Any In-Stent Restenosis: The DARE Trial.
    Baan J, Claessen BE, Dijk KB, Vendrik J, van der Schaaf RJ, Meuwissen M, van Royen N, Gosselink ATM, van Wely MH, Dirkali A, Arkenbout EK, de Winter RJ, Koch KT, Sjauw KD, Beijk MA, Vis MM, Wykrzykowska JJ, Piek JJ, Tijssen JGP, Henriques JPS.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb 12; 11(3):275-283. PubMed ID: 29413242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Usefulness of Drug-Eluting Balloons for Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting In-Stent Restenosis (from the RIBS IV and V Randomized Trials).
    Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, García Del Blanco B, García-Touchard A, López-Mínguez JR, Sabaté M, Zueco J, Melgares R, Hernández R, Moreno R, Domínguez A, Sanchís J, Moris C, Moreu J, Cequier A, Romaguera R, Rivero F, Cuesta J, Gonzalo N, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Cárdenas A, Fernández C, Spanish Society of Cardiology.
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Apr 01; 119(7):983-990. PubMed ID: 28139220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Long-Term Results of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: The RIBS VI Study.
    Cuesta J, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, García Del Blanco B, Bosa F, Pérez de Prado A, Rumoroso JR, Romaguera R, Gutiérrez H, García Touchard A, López-Mínguez JR, Trillo R, de la Torre Hernández JM, Moreno R, Velázquez M, Moris C, Kockar MJ, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Bastante T, Del Val D, Rivero F, Alfonso F.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Aug 12; 17(15):1825-1836. PubMed ID: 39142758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Rationale and design of the RIBS IV randomised clinical trial (drug-eluting balloons versus everolimus-eluting stents for patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis).
    Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Cárdenas A, García Del Blanco B, García-Touchard A, López-Minguéz JR, Rivero F, Masotti M, Zueco J, Cequier A, Morís C, Fernández-Ortíz A, Escaned J, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Gonzalo N, Fernández C, Macaya C, Restenosis Intra-stent: drug-eluting Balloon vs. everolimus-eluting Stent (RIBS IV) Study Investigators (under the auspices of the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology).
    EuroIntervention; 2015 Jul 12; 11(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 25244700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Impact of lesion length and vessel size on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents pooled analysis from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials.
    Claessen BE, Smits PC, Kereiakes DJ, Parise H, Fahy M, Kedhi E, Serruys PW, Lansky AJ, Cristea E, Sudhir K, Sood P, Simonton CA, Stone GW.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov 12; 4(11):1209-15. PubMed ID: 22115661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT clinical trials program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Dangas GD, Serruys PW, Kereiakes DJ, Hermiller J, Rizvi A, Newman W, Sudhir K, Smith RS, Cao S, Theodoropoulos K, Cutlip DE, Lansky AJ, Stone GW.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep 12; 6(9):914-22. PubMed ID: 24050859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Efficacy of a seal-wing paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters in the treatment of bare metal stent restenosis.
    Pleva L, Kukla P, Zapletalova J, Hlinomaz O.
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Jun 26; 17(1):168. PubMed ID: 28651572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.