These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

129 related items for PubMed ID: 26738054

  • 1. Distributed pressure sensors for a urethral catheter.
    Ahmadi M, Rajamani R, Timm G, Sezen AS.
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():7610-3. PubMed ID: 26738054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Instrumented Urethral Catheter and Its Ex Vivo Validation in a Sheep Urethra.
    Ahmadi M, Rajamani R, Timm G, Sezen S.
    Meas Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):. PubMed ID: 28959090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A simple inexpensive urodynamic catheter.
    Woodside JR, McGuire EJ.
    J Urol; 1979 Dec; 122(6):788-9. PubMed ID: 513224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of urethral profilometry using microtip and fiberoptic catheters.
    Elser DM, London W, Fantl JA, McBride MA, Beck RP.
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 1999 Dec; 10(6):371-4. PubMed ID: 10614972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Stereographic urethral pressure profile.
    Morita T, Tsuchida S.
    Urol Int; 1984 Dec; 39(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 6485180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Urethral pressure profilometry with membrane catheter compared with perfusion catheter systems.
    Schmidt RA, Witherow R, van Gool JD, Tanagho EA.
    Urol Int; 1978 Dec; 33(5):345-54. PubMed ID: 705985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of microtransducer and fiberoptic catheters for urodynamic studies.
    Culligan PJ, Goldberg RP, Blackhurst DW, Sasso K, Koduri S, Sand PK.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Aug; 98(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 11506841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Safer urethral catheters: how study of catheter balloon pressure and force can guide design.
    Wu AK, Blaschko SD, Garcia M, McAninch JW, Aaronson DS.
    BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109(7):1110-4. PubMed ID: 21871052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Value of urethral pressure profilometry in the female incontinent patient: a prospective trial with an 8-channel urethral catheter.
    Haeusler G, Tempfer C, Heinzl H, Sam C, Hefler L, Hanzal E, Koelbl H.
    Urology; 1998 Dec; 52(6):1113-7. PubMed ID: 9836565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.