These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
247 related items for PubMed ID: 26738382
1. [Comparative study on electronic sphygmomanometer and mercury sphygmomanometer among adults in the field study]. Yu D, Li D, Guo Q, Yu W, Xu X, Zhao L. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2015 Nov; 44(6):914-7. PubMed ID: 26738382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Mean blood pressure among the adults in China 2010-2012: based on the results of mercury sphygmomanometer and converted electronic sphygmomanometer]. Yu DM, Fu P, Yu WT, Guo HJ, Yang XG, Zhao WH, Zhao LY. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct 06; 51(10):933-938. PubMed ID: 29036997 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace. Elliott WJ, Young PE, DeVivo L, Feldstein J, Black HR. Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb 06; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Park SH, Park YS. Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec 06; 24(6):265-276. PubMed ID: 31658107 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT). Topouchian JA, El Assaad MA, Orobinskaia LV, El Feghali RN, Asmar RG. Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun 06; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between blood pressure readings using a mercury versus an aneroid sphygmomanometer. Farhan K, Naqvi STS, Rizvi SAH, Zafar A, Rawala MS. Blood Press Monit; 2020 Feb 06; 25(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 31764009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of Missouri aneroid sphygmomanometer to measure blood pressure in patients with cancer. Ferreira KA, Santos AC, Arthur TC, Santos DA, Pereira D, Freitas EO, Fukuda FM, Baia WR. Arq Bras Cardiol; 2010 Aug 06; 95(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 20658091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical validation of aneroid sphygmomanometer. Saxena Y, Saxena V, Gupta R. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012 Aug 06; 56(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23734440 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer. Rotch AL, Dean JO, Kendrach MG, Wright SG, Woolley TW. Ann Pharmacother; 2001 Aug 06; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults. Altunkan S, Ilman N, Kayatürk N, Altunkan E. Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug 06; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs. Neuhauser HK, Ellert U, Thamm M, Adler C. Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb 06; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the accuracy and errors of blood pressure measured by 2 types of non-mercury sphygmomanometers in an epidemiological survey. Choi S, Kim YM, Shin J, Lim YH, Choi SY, Choi BY, Oh KW, Lee HM, Woo KJ. Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun 06; 97(25):e10851. PubMed ID: 29923975 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]