These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
260 related items for PubMed ID: 26740649
1. Cochlear Implant Stimulation of a Hearing Ear Generates Separate Electrophonic and Electroneural Responses. Sato M, Baumhoff P, Kral A. J Neurosci; 2016 Jan 06; 36(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 26740649 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig. Stronks HC, Versnel H, Prijs VF, Klis SF. Hear Res; 2010 Jan 06; 259(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 19840841 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status. Shepherd RK, Javel E. Hear Res; 1997 Jun 06; 108(1-2):112-44. PubMed ID: 9213127 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of electroneural versus electrophonic stimulation on psychoacoustic electric-acoustic masking in cochlear implant users with residual hearing. Kipping D, Krüger B, Nogueira W. Hear Res; 2020 Sep 15; 395():108036. PubMed ID: 32736202 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors associated with hearing loss in a normal-hearing guinea pig model of Hybrid cochlear implants. Tanaka C, Nguyen-Huynh A, Loera K, Stark G, Reiss L. Hear Res; 2014 Oct 15; 316():82-93. PubMed ID: 25128626 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Middle latency responses to acoustical and electrical stimulation of the cochlea in cats. Popelár J, Hartmann R, Syka J, Klinke R. Hear Res; 1995 Dec 15; 92(1-2):63-77. PubMed ID: 8647747 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users. Abbas PJ, Tejani VD, Scheperle RA, Brown CJ. Ear Hear; 2017 Dec 15; 38(4):409-425. PubMed ID: 28085738 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model. Reiss LA, Stark G, Nguyen-Huynh AT, Spear KA, Zhang H, Tanaka C, Li H. Hear Res; 2015 Sep 15; 327():163-74. PubMed ID: 26087114 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration. Garadat SN, Colesa DJ, Swiderski DL, Raphael Y, Pfingst BE. Hear Res; 2022 Feb 15; 414():108404. PubMed ID: 34883366 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study. Xu J, Shepherd RK, Millard RE, Clark GM. Hear Res; 1997 Mar 15; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens. Shepherd RK, Matsushima J, Martin RL, Clark GM. Hear Res; 1994 Dec 15; 81(1-2):150-66. PubMed ID: 7737922 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A Guinea Pig Model Suggests That Objective Assessment of Acoustic Hearing Preservation in Human Ears With Cochlear Implants Is Confounded by Shifts in the Spatial Origin of Acoustically Evoked Potential Measurements Along the Cochlear Length. Lee C, Hartsock JJ, Salt AN, Lichtenhan JT. Ear Hear; 1994 Dec 15; 45(3):666-678. PubMed ID: 38178312 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Band-Limited Chirp-Evoked Compound Action Potential in Guinea Pig: Comprehensive Neural Measure for Cochlear Implantation Monitoring. Adel Y, Tillein J, Petzold H, Weissgerber T, Baumann U. Ear Hear; 2021 Dec 15; 42(1):142-162. PubMed ID: 32665481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure. Kim JS, Tejani VD, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. Hear Res; 2018 Dec 15; 370():304-315. PubMed ID: 30393003 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of an electrode for the artificial cochlear sensory epithelium. Tona Y, Inaoka T, Ito J, Kawano S, Nakagawa T. Hear Res; 2015 Dec 15; 330(Pt A):106-12. PubMed ID: 26299844 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating mechanical responses to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea. McAnally KI, Brown M, Clark GM. Hear Res; 1997 Apr 15; 106(1-2):146-53. PubMed ID: 9112114 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons? Coco A, Epp SB, Fallon JB, Xu J, Millard RE, Shepherd RK. Hear Res; 2007 Mar 15; 225(1-2):60-70. PubMed ID: 17258411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory response to intracochlear electric stimuli following furosemide treatment. Hu N, Abbas PJ, Miller CA, Robinson BK, Nourski KV, Jeng FC, Abkes BA, Nichols JM. Hear Res; 2003 Nov 15; 185(1-2):77-89. PubMed ID: 14599695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Insertion trauma and recovery of function after cochlear implantation: Evidence from objective functional measures. Pfingst BE, Hughes AP, Colesa DJ, Watts MM, Strahl SB, Raphael Y. Hear Res; 2015 Dec 15; 330(Pt A):98-105. PubMed ID: 26209185 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation. Heffer LF, Sly DJ, Fallon JB, White MW, Shepherd RK, O'Leary SJ. J Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec 15; 104(6):3124-35. PubMed ID: 20926607 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]