These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
222 related items for PubMed ID: 2674979
1. Transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal biopsy: a histologic and cytologic comparison for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Lee F, Torp-Pedersen S, Soiderer MH, Kumasaka GH, Littrup PJ, McHugh TA, Schmitter SP, Chang TT, Meyer-Haass GM. Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 303():11-7. PubMed ID: 2674979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A technique of transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal random prostate biopsy in patients with ulcerative colitis and an ileal pouch. Fergany AF, Angermeier KW. J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):205-6. PubMed ID: 10604348 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Transperineal prostatic biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasonography. Vallancien G, Leo JP, Brisset JM. Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987 Jan; 243B():25-7. PubMed ID: 3309985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Transperineal prostatic biopsy guided by ultrasound]. Xu YM. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Apr; 27(4):231-2, 254. PubMed ID: 2478348 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy. Hara R, Jo Y, Fujii T, Kondo N, Yokoyoma T, Miyaji Y, Nagai A. Urology; 2008 Feb; 71(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 18308081 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Complications of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy. Miller J, Perumalla C, Heap G. ANZ J Surg; 2005 Feb; 75(1-2):48-50. PubMed ID: 15740517 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of prostatic biopsy guided or not guided by echography]. Cosciani Cunico S, Da Pozzo GP, Giongo A, Frego E, Zambolin T. J Urol (Paris); 1989 Feb; 95(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 2664003 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the efficacy of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer. Vallancien G, Prapotnich D, Sibert L, Lugagne PM, Veillon B, Brisset JM, Andre-Bougaran J. Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989 Feb; 303():1-9. PubMed ID: 2674978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Transrectal biopsy of the prostate guided by transrectal ultrasound. Torp-Pedersen ST, Lee F. Urol Clin North Am; 1989 Nov; 16(4):703-12. PubMed ID: 2683300 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cytologic diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma by transrectal prostatic aspiration biopsy]. Ma WX. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Nov; 27(11):660-3, 701. PubMed ID: 2632196 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prostatic cancer: role of echography in the diagnosis, evaluation and surveillance]. Fornage B. Bull Cancer; 1985 Nov; 72(5):442-51. PubMed ID: 2416372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis, staging, guided needle biopsy, and screening for prostate cancer. Lee F. Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987 Nov; 237():73-109. PubMed ID: 3317434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Combination of perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a randomized, controlled trial. Giannarini G, Autorino R, Valent F, Mogorovich A, Manassero F, De Maria M, Morelli G, Barbone F, Di Lorenzo G, Selli C. J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):585-91; discussion 591-3. PubMed ID: 19084860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cancer core distribution in patients diagnosed by extended transperineal prostate biopsy. Satoh T, Matsumoto K, Fujita T, Tabata K, Okusa H, Tsuboi T, Arakawa T, Irie A, Egawa S, Baba S. Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 15992910 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy. Takenaka A, Hara R, Ishimura T, Fujii T, Jo Y, Nagai A, Fujisawa M. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2008 Jul; 11(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 17533394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal sampling sites for repeat prostate biopsy: a recursive partitioning analysis of three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy. Kawakami S, Okuno T, Yonese J, Igari T, Arai G, Fujii Y, Kageyama Y, Fukui I, Kihara K. Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):675-82; discussion 682-3. PubMed ID: 16843585 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Needle aspiration and core biopsy of prostate cancer: comparative evaluation with biplanar transrectal US guidance. Lee F, Littrup PJ, McLeary RD, Kumusaka GH, Borlaza GS, McHugh TA, Soiderer MH, Roi LD. Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 3550883 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Trans-rectal versus trans-perineal saturation rebiopsy of the prostate: is there a difference in cancer detection rate? Abdollah F, Novara G, Briganti A, Scattoni V, Raber M, Roscigno M, Suardi N, Gallina A, Artibani W, Ficarra V, Cestari A, Guazzoni G, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Urology; 2011 Apr; 77(4):921-5. PubMed ID: 21131034 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [A study of transrectal aspiration biopsy of the prostate]. Fujioka T, Ishii N, Chiba R, Majima K, Numata I, Hakozaki H. Hinyokika Kiyo; 1984 Sep; 30(9):1189-94. PubMed ID: 6524561 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]