These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

412 related items for PubMed ID: 26756155

  • 1. Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.
    Holder JT, Sheffield SW, Gifford RH.
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e50-5. PubMed ID: 26756155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Speech Recognition in Noise for Adults With Normal Hearing: Age-Normative Performance for AzBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.
    Holder JT, Levin LM, Gifford RH.
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e972-e978. PubMed ID: 30247429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC, Pogue J, Milrany T.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Dec; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Adaptation of the BKB-SIN test for use as a pediatric aided outcome measure.
    Ng SL, Meston CN, Scollie SD, Seewald RC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jun; 22(6):375-86. PubMed ID: 21864474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS, Chisolm TH, Blasco GP, Shinnick LJ, Ketter KJ, Krause JC.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Determining cochlear implant users' true noise tolerance: use of speech reception threshold in noise testing.
    Poissant SF, Bero EM, Busekroos L, Shao W.
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 24518402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants.
    Gifford RH, Olund AP, DeJong M.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Norwegian Hearing in Noise Test for Children.
    Myhrum M, Tvete OE, Heldahl MG, Moen I, Soli SD.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Oct; 37(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 26462169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Wilson RH, McArdle RA, Smith SL.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 17675590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.
    Gifford RH, Shallop JK, Peterson AM.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 Aug; 13(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 18212519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Listening Tasks for Younger and Older Adults.
    Smeal M, Snapp H, Ausili S, Holcomb M, Prentiss S.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022 Aug; 27(5):377-387. PubMed ID: 35636400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB, Holden LK, Skinner MW, Tobey EA, Peterson A, Gaggl W, Runge-Samuelson CL, Wackym PA.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The MAndarin spoken word-Picture IDentification test in noise-Adaptive (MAPID-A) measures subtle speech-recognition-in-noise changes and spatial release from masking in very young children.
    Yuen KCP, Qiu XY, Mou HY, Xi X.
    PLoS One; 2019 Aug; 14(1):e0209768. PubMed ID: 30629627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Blankenship C, Zhang F, Keith R.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A Large-Scale Study of the Relationship Between Degree and Type of Hearing Loss and Recognition of Speech in Quiet and Noise.
    Smith ML, Winn MB, Fitzgerald MB.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Oct; 45(4):915-928. PubMed ID: 38389129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC, Wroblewski M, Hajicek J, Rubinstein A.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH, McArdle R, Watts KL, Smith SL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S, Dillon H.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.