These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
13. Comparison between low-dose multidetector computed coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging test in patients with intermediate pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease. Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL, Bertella E, Mushtaq S, Cortinovis S, Chiappa L, Annoni A, Formenti A, Trabattoni D, Montorsi P, Ballerini G, Fiorentini C, Pepi M. Int J Cardiol; 2011 Mar 17; 147(3):454-7. PubMed ID: 21277641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Takx RA, Blomberg BA, El Aidi H, Habets J, de Jong PA, Nagel E, Hoffmann U, Leiner T. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan 17; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. CT Coronary Angiography in Kidney Transplantation Candidates. Nerlekar N, Nasis A. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar 17; 9(3):328-9. PubMed ID: 26965736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effective radiation dose in coronary imaging modalities: Back to Basics. Deshmukh P, Levy MS. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun 17; 85(7):1182-3. PubMed ID: 25999277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-Analysis of Coronary Computed Tomography Versus Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain. Al-Abdouh A, Mhanna M, Jabri A, Abusnina W, As-Sayaideh M, Upadhrasta S, Paul TK. Am J Cardiol; 2022 Nov 15; 183():153-154. PubMed ID: 36127181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Authors Reply. Winther S, Svensson M, Jørgensen HS, Bouchelouche K, Gormsen LC, Pedersen BB, Holm NR, Bøtker HE, Ivarsen P, Bøttcher M. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar 15; 9(3):329-30. PubMed ID: 26965737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]