These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

339 related items for PubMed ID: 26785886

  • 1. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
    Wang H, Hong S, Teng H, Qiao L, Yin H.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 26785886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.
    Goto S, Sakamoto T, Ganeko R, Hida K, Furukawa TA, Sakai Y.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr 09; 4(4):CD012124. PubMed ID: 32271475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zaki MN, Wing DA, McNulty JA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr 09; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
    Madsen AM, Dow ML, Lohse CM, Tessmer-Tuck JA.
    BJOG; 2019 Mar 09; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
    Schrufer-Poland TL, Ruiz MP, Kassar S, Tomassian C, Algren SD, Yeast JD.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov 09; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture.
    Zaki MN, Truong M, Pyra M, Kominiarek MA, Irwin T.
    J Perinatol; 2016 Oct 09; 36(10):819-22. PubMed ID: 27253895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tuuli MG, Rampersad RM, Carbone JF, Stamilio D, Macones GA, Odibo AO.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar 09; 117(3):682-690. PubMed ID: 21343772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, Garner R, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Hauth J, Tita AT.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan 09; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han D, Feng L, Xu L, Li C, Zhang Q.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct 09; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?
    Cooper SM, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM, Tita ATN.
    Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul 09; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
    Rodel RL, Gray KM, Quiner TE, Bodea Braescu A, Gerkin R, Perlow JH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan 09; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
    Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct 09; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep 12; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
    Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar 12; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
    Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, Martin S, Rampersad RM, Cahill AG, Macones GA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct 12; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Clay FS, Walsh CA, Walsh SR.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May 12; 204(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 21195384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status.
    Fitzwater JL, Jauk VC, Figueroa D, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Tita AT.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 May 12; 29(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 25567558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mackeen AD, Sullivan MV, Schuster M, Berghella V.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug 01; 140(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35852281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.