These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Accuracy of Tumor Sizing in Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Strain Elastography, 3-D Ultrasound and Conventional B-Mode Ultrasound with and without Compound Imaging. Stachs A, Pandjaitan A, Martin A, Stubert J, Hartmann S, Gerber B, Glass Ä. Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2758-2765. PubMed ID: 27600473 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses. Chen L, Chen Y, Diao XH, Fang L, Pang Y, Cheng AQ, Li WP, Wang Y. Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions. Ianculescu V, Ciolovan LM, Dunant A, Vielh P, Mazouni C, Delaloge S, Dromain C, Blidaru A, Balleyguier C. Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):773-7. PubMed ID: 24602803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio. Stachs A, Hartmann S, Stubert J, Dieterich M, Martin A, Kundt G, Reimer T, Gerber B. Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of real-time tissue sono-elastography in the assessment of 214 breast lesions: limitations of this method resulting from different histologic subtypes, tumor size and tumor localization. Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Degenhardt F. Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2264-71. PubMed ID: 24063962 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Strain elastography for prediction of breast cancer tumor grades. Grajo JR, Barr RG. J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 24371107 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]