These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

448 related items for PubMed ID: 26792823

  • 1. Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation.
    Østerås BH, Martinsen AC, Brandal SH, Chaudhry KN, Eben E, Haakenaasen U, Falk RS, Skaane P.
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1178-85. PubMed ID: 26792823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
    Sartor H, Lång K, Rosso A, Borgquist S, Zackrisson S, Timberg P.
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment.
    Gweon HM, Youk JH, Kim JA, Son EJ.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 23971465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories.
    Singh T, Sharma M, Singla V, Khandelwal N.
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
    Youk JH, Kim SJ, Son EJ, Gweon HM, Kim JA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. BI-RADS Density Classification From Areometric and Volumetric Automatic Breast Density Measurements.
    Østerås BH, Martinsen AC, Brandal SH, Chaudhry KN, Eben E, Haakenaasen U, Falk RS, Skaane P.
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):468-78. PubMed ID: 26847741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
    Martin KE, Helvie MA, Zhou C, Roubidoux MA, Bailey JE, Paramagul C, Blane CE, Klein KA, Sonnad SS, Chan HP.
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting.
    van der Waal D, den Heeten GJ, Pijnappel RM, Schuur KH, Timmers JM, Verbeek AL, Broeders MJ.
    PLoS One; 2015 Sep; 10(9):e0136667. PubMed ID: 26335569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
    Jeffers AM, Sieh W, Lipson JA, Rothstein JH, McGuire V, Whittemore AS, Rubin DL.
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in determining breast density according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS® Atlas.
    Pesce K, Tajerian M, Chico MJ, Swiecicki MP, Boietti B, Frangella MJ, Benitez S.
    Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2020 Feb; 62(6):481-486. PubMed ID: 32493654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
    Brandt KR, Scott CG, Ma L, Mahmoudzadeh AP, Jensen MR, Whaley DH, Wu FF, Malkov S, Hruska CB, Norman AD, Heine J, Shepherd J, Pankratz VS, Kerlikowske K, Vachon CM.
    Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.