These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


504 related items for PubMed ID: 26799770

  • 1. A novel LabVIEW-based multi-channel non-invasive abdominal maternal-fetal electrocardiogram signal generator.
    Martinek R, Kelnar M, Koudelka P, Vanus J, Bilik P, Janku P, Nazeran H, Zidek J.
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Feb; 37(2):238-56. PubMed ID: 26799770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A novel modular fetal ECG STAN and HRV analysis: Towards robust hypoxia detection.
    Martinek R, Kahankova R, Martin B, Nedoma J, Fajkus M.
    Technol Health Care; 2019 Feb; 27(3):257-287. PubMed ID: 30562910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Integration of multivariate empirical mode decomposition and independent component analysis for fetal ECG separation from abdominal signals.
    Thanaraj P, Roshini M, Balasubramanian P.
    Technol Health Care; 2016 Nov 14; 24(6):783-794. PubMed ID: 27315149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A multi-step method with signal quality assessment and fine-tuning procedure to locate maternal and fetal QRS complexes from abdominal ECG recordings.
    Liu C, Li P, Di Maria C, Zhao L, Zhang H, Chen Z.
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Aug 14; 35(8):1665-83. PubMed ID: 25069817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Influence of Vectorcardiogram Orientation on the T/QRS Ratio Obtained Via Non-Invasive Fetal ECG.
    Keenan E, Karmakar CK, Palaniswami M.
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul 14; 2019():1883-1886. PubMed ID: 31946265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Extraction of fetal electrocardiogram using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems.
    Assaleh K.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan 14; 54(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 17260856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Dynamic segmentation and linear prediction for maternal ECG removal in antenatal abdominal recordings.
    Vullings R, Peters CH, Sluijter RJ, Mischi M, Oei SG, Bergmans JW.
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Mar 14; 30(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 19223679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Single-lead noninvasive fetal ECG extraction by means of combining clustering and principal components analysis.
    Zhang Y, Yu S.
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Feb 14; 58(2):419-432. PubMed ID: 31858419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Intrapartum signal quality with external fetal heart rate monitoring: a two way trial of external Doppler CTG ultrasound and the abdominal fetal electrocardiogram.
    Reinhard J, Hayes-Gill BR, Schiermeier S, Hatzmann W, Herrmann E, Heinrich TM, Louwen F.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov 14; 286(5):1103-7. PubMed ID: 22714064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Using Maternal Abdominal Surface Electrodes in Third Trimester: Can We Obtain Additional Information Other than CTG Trace?
    Fuchs T, Grobelak K, Pomorski M, Zimmer M.
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016 Nov 14; 25(2):309-16. PubMed ID: 27627565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography in singleton and multiple pregnancies.
    Taylor MJ, Smith MJ, Thomas M, Green AR, Cheng F, Oseku-Afful S, Wee LY, Fisk NM, Gardiner HM.
    BJOG; 2003 Jul 14; 110(7):668-78. PubMed ID: 12842058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fetal ECG extraction via Type-2 adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems.
    Ahmadieh H, Asl BM.
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Apr 14; 142():101-108. PubMed ID: 28325438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram to Doppler cardiotocogram during the 1st stage of labor.
    Reinhard J, Hayes-Gill BR, Yi Q, Hatzmann H, Schiermeier S.
    J Perinat Med; 2010 Mar 14; 38(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 20121540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Non-invasive acquisition of fetal ECG from the maternal xyphoid process: a feasibility study in pregnant sheep and a call for open data sets.
    Shen C, Frasch MG, Wu HT, Herry CL, Cao M, Desrochers A, Fecteau G, Burns P.
    Physiol Meas; 2018 Mar 27; 39(3):035005. PubMed ID: 29369821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. New Features for the Detection of Fetal QRS Complexes in Non-Invasive Fetal Electrocardiograms.
    Lakshmisha N, Butoliya A, Bajaj V, Gadre VM, Mukherji S.
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul 27; 2023():1-5. PubMed ID: 38082674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Robust fetal QRS detection from noninvasive abdominal electrocardiogram based on channel selection and simultaneous multichannel processing.
    Ghaffari A, Mollakazemi MJ, Atyabi SA, Niknazar M.
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Dec 27; 38(4):581-92. PubMed ID: 26462679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Extraction of foetal ECG from abdominal ECG by nonlinear transformation and estimations.
    John RG, Ramachandran KI.
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul 27; 175():193-204. PubMed ID: 31104707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Single-lead fetal electrocardiogram estimation by means of combining R-peak detection, resampling and comb filter.
    Zheng W, Liu H, He A, Ning X, Cheng J.
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Sep 27; 32(7):708-19. PubMed ID: 20466579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Intrapartum heart rate ambiguity: a comparison of cardiotocogram and abdominal fetal electrocardiogram with maternal electrocardiogram.
    Reinhard J, Hayes-Gill BR, Schiermeier S, Hatzmann H, Heinrich TM, Louwen F.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013 Sep 27; 75(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23328351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Elicitation of fetal ECG from abdominal recordings using Blind Source Separation techniques and Robust Set Membership Affine Projection algorithm for signal quality enhancement.
    Diwan S, Sahu M, Bhateja V.
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Aug 27; 178():108764. PubMed ID: 38908358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.