These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

96 related items for PubMed ID: 26803225

  • 1. Performance evaluation of a retrofit digital detector-based mammography system.
    Marshall NW, van Ongeval C, Bosmans H.
    Phys Med; 2016 Feb; 32(2):312-22. PubMed ID: 26803225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW, Lemmens K, Bosmans H.
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May 07; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
    Di Maria S, Baptista M, Felix M, Oliveira N, Matela N, Janeiro L, Vaz P, Orvalho L, Silva A.
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun 07; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of anode/filter combinations in digital mammography with respect to the average glandular dose.
    Uhlenbrock DF, Mertelmeier T.
    Rofo; 2009 Mar 07; 181(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 19241602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
    Marshall NW, Monnin P, Bosmans H, Bochud FO, Verdun FR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul 21; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Measurement of effective detective quantum efficiency for a photon counting scanning mammography system and comparison with two flat panel full-field digital mammography systems.
    Wood TJ, Moore CS, Saunderson JR, Beavis AW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan 16; 63(2):025025. PubMed ID: 29260730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Monte Carlo performance on the x-ray converter thickness in digital mammography using software breast models.
    Liaparinos P, Bliznakova K.
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov 16; 39(11):6638-51. PubMed ID: 23127058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov 07; 51(21):5655-73. PubMed ID: 17047276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Tailoring automatic exposure control toward constant detectability in digital mammography.
    Salvagnini E, Bosmans H, Struelens L, Marshall NW.
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul 07; 42(7):3834-47. PubMed ID: 26133585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
    Engelken FJ, Meyer H, Juran R, Bick U, Fallenberg E, Diekmann F.
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct 07; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Performance evaluation of contrast-detail in full field digital mammography systems using ideal (Hotelling) observer vs. conventional automated analysis of CDMAM images for quality control of contrast-detail characteristics.
    Delakis I, Wise R, Morris L, Kulama E.
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov 07; 31(7):741-6. PubMed ID: 25735660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.