These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

242 related items for PubMed ID: 26813761

  • 1. A proposed regulatory framework for genome-edited crops.
    Huang S, Weigel D, Beachy RN, Li J.
    Nat Genet; 2016 Feb; 48(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 26813761
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Bottlenecks for genome-edited crops on the road from lab to farm.
    Scheben A, Edwards D.
    Genome Biol; 2018 Oct 26; 19(1):178. PubMed ID: 30367679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Looking forward to genetically edited fruit crops.
    Nagamangala Kanchiswamy C, Sargent DJ, Velasco R, Maffei ME, Malnoy M.
    Trends Biotechnol; 2015 Feb 26; 33(2):62-4. PubMed ID: 25129425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Europe's genetically edited plants stuck in legal limbo.
    Abbott A.
    Nature; 2015 Dec 17; 528(7582):319-20. PubMed ID: 26672535
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops.
    Ishii T, Araki M.
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan 02; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 27960622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Regulatory regimes for transgenic crops.
    Wilson A, Latham J, Steinbrecher R.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jul 02; 23(7):785; author reply 787-9. PubMed ID: 16003352
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Crop Gene-Editing: Should We Bypass or Apply Existing GMO Policy?
    Ishii T.
    Trends Plant Sci; 2018 Nov 02; 23(11):947-950. PubMed ID: 30241735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Transgenic crops why gene flow matters.
    Snow AA.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun 02; 20(6):542. PubMed ID: 12042845
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. European Union moves to curb moratorium on transgenic plants.
    Schiermeier Q.
    Nature; 2001 Feb 22; 409(6823):967-8. PubMed ID: 11234031
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security.
    Georges F, Ray H.
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan 02; 8(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 28075688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Crop conundrum.
    Nature; 2015 Dec 17; 528(7582):307-8. PubMed ID: 26672517
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Rethinking substantial equivalence.
    Schenkelaars P.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Feb 17; 20(2):119. PubMed ID: 11821850
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. National politicians block GM progress.
    Hodgson J.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep 17; 18(9):918-9. PubMed ID: 10973199
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion.
    Lassoued R, Macall DM, Hesseln H, Phillips PWB, Smyth SJ.
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Apr 17; 28(2):247-256. PubMed ID: 30830581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. EC struggles to unravel regulations.
    Hodgson J.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jul 17; 18(7):705-6. PubMed ID: 10888826
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Follow my leader.
    Miller HI.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Dec 17; 19(12):1103. PubMed ID: 11731770
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. We must not be bound by anti-GM extremists.
    Miller HI.
    Nature; 2001 Mar 22; 410(6827):408. PubMed ID: 11260683
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.