These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

235 related items for PubMed ID: 26822795

  • 1. Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.
    Lu ML, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Davis KG.
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):667-82. PubMed ID: 26822795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Efficacy of the revised NIOSH lifting equation to predict risk of low-back pain associated with manual lifting: a one-year prospective study.
    Lu ML, Waters TR, Krieg E, Werren D.
    Hum Factors; 2014 Feb; 56(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 24669544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Improving the risk assessment capability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation by incorporating personal characteristics.
    Barim MS, Sesek RF, Capanoglu MF, Drinkaus P, Schall MC, Gallagher S, Davis GA.
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():67-73. PubMed ID: 30487111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Modification of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Lifting Equation to Determine the Individual Manual Lifting Risk in Malaysia's Manufacturing Industry.
    Dawad NA, Yasin SM, Darus A, Jamil AT, Nyi Naing N.
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e57747. PubMed ID: 38715993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Understanding outcome metrics of the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
    Fox RR, Lu ML, Occhipinti E, Jaeger M.
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102897. PubMed ID: 31422239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The NIOSH lifting equation and low-back pain, Part 1: Association with low-back pain in the backworks prospective cohort study.
    Garg A, Boda S, Hegmann KT, Moore JS, Kapellusch JM, Bhoyar P, Thiese MS, Merryweather A, Deckow-Schaefer G, Bloswick D, Malloy EJ.
    Hum Factors; 2014 Feb; 56(1):6-28. PubMed ID: 24669540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The NIOSH lifting equation and low-back pain, Part 2: Association with seeking care in the backworks prospective cohort study.
    Garg A, Kapellusch JM, Hegmann KT, Moore JS, Boda S, Bhoyar P, Thiese MS, Merryweather A, Deckow-Schaefer G, Bloswick D, Malloy EJ.
    Hum Factors; 2014 Feb; 56(1):44-57. PubMed ID: 24669542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Efficacy of the revised NIOSH lifting equation to predict risk of low back pain due to manual lifting: expanded cross-sectional analysis.
    Waters TR, Lu ML, Piacitelli LA, Werren D, Deddens JA.
    J Occup Environ Med; 2011 Sep; 53(9):1061-7. PubMed ID: 21866048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Variable Lifting Index (VLI): A New Method for Evaluating Variable Lifting Tasks.
    Waters T, Occhipinti E, Colombini D, Alvarez-Casado E, Fox R.
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):695-711. PubMed ID: 26646300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Variable Lifting Index for Manual-Lifting Risk Assessment: A Preliminary Validation Study.
    Battevi N, Pandolfi M, Cortinovis I.
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):712-25. PubMed ID: 27037305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation and quantification of manual materials handling risk factors.
    Sesek R, Gilkey D, Drinkaus P, Bloswick DS, Herron R.
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2003 Aug; 9(3):271-87. PubMed ID: 14577945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The Cumulative Lifting Index (CULI) for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation: Quantifying Risk for Workers With Job Rotation.
    Garg A, Kapellusch JM.
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):683-94. PubMed ID: 26896406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The accuracy of a 2D video-based lifting monitor.
    Wang X, Hu YH, Lu ML, Radwin RG.
    Ergonomics; 2019 Aug; 62(8):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 31092146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Mechanical lifting energy consumption in work activities designed by means of the "revised NIOSH lifting equation".
    Ranavolo A, Varrecchia T, Rinaldi M, Silvetti A, Serrao M, Conforto S, Draicchio F.
    Ind Health; 2017 Oct 07; 55(5):444-454. PubMed ID: 28781290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Revised NIOSH lifting equation: a critical evaluation.
    Ahmad S, Muzammil M.
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Mar 07; 29(1):358-365. PubMed ID: 35253606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Predicting the load constant of the revised NIOSH lifting equation based on demographics.
    Ahmad S, Muzammil M.
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Sep 07; 29(3):1016-1024. PubMed ID: 35758150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the revised NIOSH lifting equation. A cross-sectional epidemiologic study.
    Waters TR, Baron SL, Piacitelli LA, Anderson VP, Skov T, Haring-Sweeney M, Wall DK, Fine LJ.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb 15; 24(4):386-94; discussion 395. PubMed ID: 10065524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.
    Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Fine LJ.
    Ergonomics; 1993 Jul 15; 36(7):749-76. PubMed ID: 8339717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. New procedure for assessing sequential manual lifting jobs using the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
    Waters TR, Lu ML, Occhipinti E.
    Ergonomics; 2007 Nov 15; 50(11):1761-70. PubMed ID: 17972201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cumulative Mass and NIOSH Variable Lifting Index Method for Risk Assessment: Possible Relations.
    Stucchi G, Battevi N, Pandolfi M, Galinotti L, Iodice S, Favero C.
    Hum Factors; 2018 Feb 15; 60(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 28967807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.