These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

539 related items for PubMed ID: 26840780

  • 1. Term elective induction of labour and perinatal outcomes in obese women: retrospective cohort study.
    Lee VR, Darney BG, Snowden JM, Main EK, Gilbert W, Chung J, Caughey AB.
    BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 26840780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Darney BG, Snowden JM, Cheng YW, Jacob L, Nicholson JM, Kaimal A, Dublin S, Getahun D, Caughey AB.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 122(4):761-769. PubMed ID: 24084532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
    Souter V, Painter I, Sitcov K, Caughey AB.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women.
    Sinkey RG, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM, Ausbeck E, Subramaniam A, Neely CL, Casey BM, Tita AT.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 31306328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.
    Gibbs Pickens CM, Kramer MR, Howards PP, Badell ML, Caughey AB, Hogue CJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 29215512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.
    Stock SJ, Ferguson E, Duffy A, Ford I, Chalmers J, Norman JE.
    BMJ; 2012 May 10; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks from a Statewide Collaborative Quality Initiative.
    Langen ES, Schiller AJ, Moore K, Jiang C, Bourdeau A, Morgan DM, Low LK.
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May 10; 41(S 01):e1281-e1287. PubMed ID: 36796400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A risk of waiting: the weekly incidence of hypertensive disorders and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk term pregnancies.
    Gibson KS, Waters TP, Bailit JL.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar 10; 214(3):389.e1-389.e12. PubMed ID: 26440691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks' gestation.
    Dunne C, Da Silva O, Schmidt G, Natale R.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Dec 10; 31(12):1124-30. PubMed ID: 20085677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial.
    Boulvain M, Senat MV, Perrotin F, Winer N, Beucher G, Subtil D, Bretelle F, Azria E, Hejaiej D, Vendittelli F, Capelle M, Langer B, Matis R, Connan L, Gillard P, Kirkpatrick C, Ceysens G, Faron G, Irion O, Rozenberg P, Groupe de Recherche en Obstétrique et Gynécologie (GROG).
    Lancet; 2015 Jun 27; 385(9987):2600-5. PubMed ID: 25863654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Maternal age and emergency operative deliveries at term: a population-based registry study among low-risk primiparous women.
    Herstad L, Klungsøyr K, Skjaerven R, Tanbo T, Forsén L, Åbyholm T, Vangen S.
    BJOG; 2015 Nov 27; 122(12):1642-51. PubMed ID: 25100277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
    Kawakita T, Iqbal SN, Huang CC, Reddy UM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct 27; 217(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 28578171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Caesarean risk in obese women at term: A retrospective cohort analysis.
    Nugent R, de Costa C, Vangaveti V.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Aug 27; 57(4):440-445. PubMed ID: 28338231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term.
    Wolfe H, Timofeev J, Tefera E, Desale S, Driggers RW.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul 27; 211(1):53.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24486226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
    Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Cheng YW, Gienger A, Little SE, Lee JF, Wong L, Shaffer BL, Tran SH, Padula A, McDonald KM, Long EF, Owens DK, Bravata DM.
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar 27; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk.
    Sinkey RG, Lacevic J, Reljic T, Hozo I, Gibson KS, Odibo AO, Djulbegovic B, Lockwood CJ.
    PLoS One; 2018 Mar 27; 13(4):e0193169. PubMed ID: 29694344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
    Rozenberg P.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov 27; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.
    Palatnik A, Kominiarek MA.
    Am J Perinatol; 2020 Jun 27; 37(7):695-707. PubMed ID: 31039597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Outcomes among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Nonmedically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management Differ by Maternal Age.
    Hersh AR, Urbanowicz E, Garg B, Schmidt EM, Packer CH, Caughey AB.
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May 27; 41(S 01):e1061-e1068. PubMed ID: 36452970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
    Grobman WA, Caughey AB.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct 27; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.