These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

930 related items for PubMed ID: 26850969

  • 1. A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update.
    Walz J, Epstein JI, Ganzer R, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Kaouk J, Menon M, Mottrie A, Myers RP, Patel V, Tewari A, Villers A, Artibani W.
    Eur Urol; 2016 Aug; 70(2):301-11. PubMed ID: 26850969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy.
    Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Myers RP, Rocco B, Villers A.
    Eur Urol; 2010 Feb; 57(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 19931974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Basic principles of anatomy for optimal surgical treatment of prostate cancer.
    Walz J, Graefen M, Huland H.
    World J Urol; 2007 Mar; 25(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17333199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery.
    Steineck G, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, Axén E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Persson J, Wilderäng U, Thorsteinsdottir T, Gustafsson O, Lagerkvist M, Jiborn T, Haglind E, Wiklund P, LAPPRO steering committee.
    Eur Urol; 2015 Mar; 67(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 25457018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Functional results and treatment of functional dysfunctions after radical prostatectomy].
    Salomon L, Droupy S, Yiou R, Soulié M.
    Prog Urol; 2015 Nov; 25(15):1028-66. PubMed ID: 26519966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Integrity of the Urethral Sphincter Complex, Nerve-sparing, and Long-term Continence Status after Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Kim M, Park M, Pak S, Choi SK, Shim M, Song C, Ahn H.
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):823-830. PubMed ID: 29759661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.
    Suardi N, Moschini M, Gallina A, Gandaglia G, Abdollah F, Capitanio U, Bianchi M, Tutolo M, Passoni N, Salonia A, Hedlund P, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Briganti A.
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 22726993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.
    Sooriakumaran P, Pini G, Nyberg T, Derogar M, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, Steineck G, Wiklund PN.
    Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):618-627. PubMed ID: 28882327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Denonvilliers' fascia acts as the fulcrum and hammock for continence after radical prostatectomy.
    Lu X, He C, Zhang S, Yang F, Guo Z, Huang J, He M, Wu J, Sheng X, Lin W, Cheng J, Guo J, Wang H.
    BMC Urol; 2021 Dec 17; 21(1):176. PubMed ID: 34920713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Noh C, Kshirsagar A, Mohler JL.
    Urology; 2003 Feb 17; 61(2):412-6. PubMed ID: 12597958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Functional Outcomes Following Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy Augmented with Seminal Vesicle Sparing Compared to Standard Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Gilbert SM, Dunn RL, Miller DC, Montgomery JS, Skolarus TA, Weizer AZ, Wood DP, Hollenbeck BK.
    J Urol; 2017 Sep 17; 198(3):600-607. PubMed ID: 28392393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy - anatomical/reconstructive and nerve-sparing techniques to improve outcomes.
    Pavlovich CP, Rocco B, Druskin SC, Davis JW.
    BJU Int; 2017 Aug 17; 120(2):185-196. PubMed ID: 28319318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Optimizing cancer control and functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy.
    Correa JJ, Pow-Sang JM.
    Cancer Control; 2010 Oct 17; 17(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20861811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Preservation of the smooth muscular internal (vesical) sphincter and of the proximal urethra for the early recovery of urinary continence after retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective case-control study.
    Brunocilla E, Schiavina R, Pultrone CV, Borghesi M, Rossi M, Cevenini M, Martorana G.
    Int J Urol; 2014 Feb 17; 21(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 23802754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 47.