These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


481 related items for PubMed ID: 26853233

  • 1. Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2 hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients.
    English R, Plant K, Maciejczyk M, Cowan R.
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S45-50. PubMed ID: 26853233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.
    Moore BC, Baer T, Ives DT, Marriage J, Salorio-Corbetto M.
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 26928003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparing the Effect of Different Hearing Aid Fitting Methods in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vroegop JL, Dingemanse JG, van der Schroeff MP, Goedegebure A.
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar 15; 28(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 30383163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
    Yang HI, Zeng FG.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar 15; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.
    Keidser G, Dillon H, Carter L, O'Brien A.
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Dec 15; 16(4):211-23. PubMed ID: 23203416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Ching TY, Incerti P, Hill M.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb 15; 25(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 14770014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC, Sęk A.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Feb 15; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE, Dillon H.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Feb 15; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear?
    Ching TY, Psarros C, Hill M, Dillon H, Incerti P.
    Ear Hear; 2001 Oct 15; 22(5):365-80. PubMed ID: 11605945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.
    Davidson LS, Firszt JB, Brenner C, Cadieux JH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr 15; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Speech recognition outcomes following bilateral cochlear implantation in adults aged over 50 years old.
    Boisvert I, McMahon CM, Dowell RC.
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Apr 15; 55 Suppl 2():S39-44. PubMed ID: 27049835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Utility of bilateral acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant.
    Plant K, Babic L.
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Apr 15; 55 Suppl 2():S31-8. PubMed ID: 26987051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of a novel bimodal fitting formula in Advanced Bionics cochlear implant recipients.
    Warren SE, Noelle Dunbar M, Bosworth C, Agrawal S.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov 15; 21(6):323-337. PubMed ID: 32664814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Self-Reported Usage, Functional Benefit, and Audiologic Characteristics of Cochlear Implant Patients Who Use a Contralateral Hearing Aid.
    Neuman AC, Waltzman SB, Shapiro WH, Neukam JD, Zeman AM, Svirsky MA.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Jan 15; 21():2331216517699530. PubMed ID: 28351216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY, Quar TK, Johnson EE, Newall P, Sharma M.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar 15; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Factors constraining the benefit to speech understanding of combining information from low-frequency hearing and a cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF, Cook S, Spahr A, Zhang T, Loiselle L, Schramm D, Whittingham J, Gifford R.
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr 15; 322():107-11. PubMed ID: 25285624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.