These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
356 related items for PubMed ID: 26857651
1. A QMRA Model for Salmonella in Pork Products During Preparation and Consumption. Swart AN, van Leusden F, Nauta MJ. Risk Anal; 2016 Mar; 36(3):516-30. PubMed ID: 26857651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of the Human Risk of Salmonellosis Related to Consumption of Pork Products in Different E.U. Countries Based on a QMRA. Vigre H, Barfoed K, Swart AN, Simons RR, Hill AA, Snary EL, Hald T. Risk Anal; 2016 Mar; 36(3):531-45. PubMed ID: 26857423 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment for Salmonella in Pigs for the European Union. Snary EL, Swart AN, Simons RR, Domingues AR, Vigre H, Evers EG, Hald T, Hill AA. Risk Anal; 2016 Mar; 36(3):437-49. PubMed ID: 27002672 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An Approach to Cluster EU Member States into Groups According to Pathways of Salmonella in the Farm-to-Consumption Chain for Pork Products. Vigre H, Domingues AR, Pedersen UB, Hald T. Risk Anal; 2016 Mar; 36(3):450-60. PubMed ID: 26856391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment of Salmonellosis from the Consumption of Australian Pork: Minced Meat from Retail to Burgers Prepared and Consumed at Home. Gurman PM, Ross T, Kiermeier A. Risk Anal; 2018 Dec; 38(12):2625-2645. PubMed ID: 30144103 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A risk modelling approach for setting microbiological limits using enterococci as indicator for growth potential of Salmonella in pork. Bollerslev AM, Nauta M, Hansen TB, Aabo S. Int J Food Microbiol; 2017 Jan 02; 240():102-107. PubMed ID: 27236464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative microbiological risk assessment of nontyphoidal Salmonella in ground pork in households in Chengdu, China. Bai L, Wang J, Sun H, Wang Y, Wang Y, Wang Q, Liu Z. Risk Anal; 2023 Jun 02; 43(6):1097-1114. PubMed ID: 35853833 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A cross-sectional study of Salmonella in pork products in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Sanguankiat A, Pinthong R, Padungtod P, Baumann MP, Zessin KH, Srikitjakarn L, Fries R. Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2010 Aug 02; 7(8):873-8. PubMed ID: 20482229 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Salmonella surveillance and control at post-harvest in the Belgian pork meat chain. Delhalle L, Saegerman C, Farnir F, Korsak N, Maes D, Messens W, De Sadeleer L, De Zutter L, Daube G. Food Microbiol; 2009 May 02; 26(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 19269567 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact on human health of Salmonella spp. on pork in The Netherlands and the anticipated effects of some currently proposed control strategies. Berends BR, Van Knapen F, Mossel DA, Burt SA, Snijders JM. Int J Food Microbiol; 1998 Nov 10; 44(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 9851601 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Interventions Targeting Deep Tissue Lymph Nodes May Not Effectively Reduce the Risk of Salmonellosis from Ground Pork Consumption: A Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment. Zhang Y, O'Connor AM, Wang C, Dickson JS, Hurd HS, Wang B. Risk Anal; 2019 Oct 10; 39(10):2237-2258. PubMed ID: 31039285 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]