These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

751 related items for PubMed ID: 26866474

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest.
    Gelfand I, Sahajpal R, Zhang X, Izaurralde RC, Gross KL, Robertson GP.
    Nature; 2013 Jan 24; 493(7433):514-7. PubMed ID: 23334409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biofuels, land, and water: a systems approach to sustainability.
    Gopalakrishnan G, Negri MC, Wang M, Wu M, Snyder SW, Lafreniere L.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Aug 01; 43(15):6094-100. PubMed ID: 19731724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of bioenergy on biodiversity arising from land-use change and crop type.
    Núñez-Regueiro MM, Siddiqui SF, Fletcher RJ.
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Feb 01; 35(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 31854480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Assessing the Returns to Land and Greenhouse Gas Savings from Producing Energy Crops on Conservation Reserve Program Land.
    Chen L, Blanc-Betes E, Hudiburg TW, Hellerstein D, Wallander S, DeLucia EH, Khanna M.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jan 19; 55(2):1301-1309. PubMed ID: 33410666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt.
    Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P.
    Science; 2008 Feb 29; 319(5867):1235-8. PubMed ID: 18258862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Alternative scenarios of bioenergy crop production in an agricultural landscape and implications for bird communities.
    Blank PJ, Williams CL, Sample DW, Meehan TD, Turner MG.
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Jan 29; 26(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 27039508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Interactions among bioenergy feedstock choices, landscape dynamics, and land use.
    Dale VH, Kline KL, Wright LL, Perlack RD, Downing M, Graham RL.
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Jun 29; 21(4):1039-54. PubMed ID: 21774412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Potential greenhouse gas reductions from Natural Climate Solutions in Oregon, USA.
    Graves RA, Haugo RD, Holz A, Nielsen-Pincus M, Jones A, Kellogg B, Macdonald C, Popper K, Schindel M.
    PLoS One; 2020 Jun 29; 15(4):e0230424. PubMed ID: 32275725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The biogeochemistry of bioenergy landscapes: carbon, nitrogen, and water considerations.
    Robertson GP, Hamilton SK, Del Grosso SJ, Parton WJ.
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Jun 29; 21(4):1055-67. PubMed ID: 21774413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The potential impacts of biomass feedstock production on water resource availability.
    Stone KC, Hunt PG, Cantrell KB, Ro KS.
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Mar 29; 101(6):2014-25. PubMed ID: 19939667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands.
    Campbell JE, Lobell DB, Genova RC, Field CB.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Aug 01; 42(15):5791-4. PubMed ID: 18754510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Integral analysis of environmental and economic performance of combined agricultural intensification & bioenergy production in the Orinoquia region.
    Ramirez-Contreras NE, Fontanilla-Díaz CA, Pardo LE, Delgado T, Munar-Florez D, Wicke B, Ruíz-Delgado J, van der Hilst F, Garcia-Nuñez JA, Mosquera-Montoya M, Faaij APC.
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Feb 01; 303():114137. PubMed ID: 34847366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Greenhouse gas mitigation on marginal land: a quantitative review of the relative benefits of forest recovery versus biofuel production.
    Evans SG, Ramage BS, DiRocco TL, Potts MD.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb 17; 49(4):2503-11. PubMed ID: 25582654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 38.