These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

97 related items for PubMed ID: 2687194

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Computed body tomography with a new nonionic contrast agent. Comparison of ioversol with sodium/meglumine diatrizoate.
    McClennan BL, Heiken JP, Lee JK, James MA.
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S35-8. PubMed ID: 2687193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical summary of initial intravenous administration of ioversol.
    McClennan BL.
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S43-6. PubMed ID: 2687195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Clinical experience with ioversol 320 in cranial computed tomographic scanning.
    Sartor K, Gado MH, Hodges FJ.
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S29-32. PubMed ID: 2687191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography.
    Sahani DV, Soulez G, Chen KM, Lepanto L, Xu JR, Nelson RC, Grazioli L, Vanzulli A, Heiken JP, Investigators of the IMPACT Study.
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):856-61. PubMed ID: 18007158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects of ioversol during cardiac angiography. Comparison with iopamidol and diatrizoate.
    Hirshfeld JW, Wieland J, Davis CA, Giles BD, Passione D, Ray MB, Ripley NS.
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Feb; 24(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 2645244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ioversol in intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Miller FJ, Pollei SR, Osborn AG.
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S52-4. PubMed ID: 2687197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Ioversol for intravenous urography: a comparison study.
    Kaufman AJ, Concepcion R, Kirchner FK, McDougal WS, Winfield AC.
    Urol Radiol; 1990 Jun; 12(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 2333674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A double blind clinical study comparing the safety, tolerance and efficacy of ioversol 240 and iohexol 240 (Omnipaque 240) in ascending venography.
    Wilkins RA, Spinks BC.
    Clin Radiol; 1990 Apr; 41(4):268-71. PubMed ID: 2187651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Iomeprol versus iopamidol in contrast-enhanced computed tomography of thoracic and abdominal organs.
    Valentini AL, Tartaglione T, Monti L, Marano P.
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S88-92. PubMed ID: 8020525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.