These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
720 related items for PubMed ID: 26880303
1. Methodological issues in human studies of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Lee DH, Jacobs DR. Rev Endocr Metab Disord; 2015 Dec; 16(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 26880303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs? Autrup H, Barile FA, Berry SC, Blaauboer BJ, Boobis A, Bolt H, Hengstler J, Borgert CJ, Dekant W, Dietrich D, Domingo JL, Gori GB, Greim H, Kacew S, Marquardt H, Pelkonen O, Savolainen K, Heslop-Harrison P, Vermeulen NP. Food Chem Toxicol; 2020 Aug; 142():111349. PubMed ID: 32360905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and breast cancer: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Wan MLY, Co VA, El-Nezami H. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2022 Aug; 62(24):6549-6576. PubMed ID: 33819127 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Endocrine disruptors: Challenges and future directions in epidemiologic research. Ho V, Pelland-St-Pierre L, Gravel S, Bouchard MF, Verner MA, Labrèche F. Environ Res; 2022 Mar; 204(Pt A):111969. PubMed ID: 34461123 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs? Autrup H, Barile FA, Berry SC, Blaauboer BJ, Boobis A, Bolt H, Borgert CJ, Dekant W, Dietrich D, Domingo JL, Gori GB, Greim H, Hengstler J, Kacew S, Marquardt H, Pelkonen O, Savolainen K, Heslop-Harrison P, Vermeulen NP. J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2020 Jul 17; 83(13-14):485-494. PubMed ID: 32552445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Penile density and globally used chemicals in Canadian and Greenland polar bears. Sonne C, Dyck M, Rigét FF, Beck Jensen JE, Hyldstrup L, Letcher RJ, Gustavson K, Gilbert MT, Dietz R. Environ Res; 2015 Feb 17; 137():287-91. PubMed ID: 25601730 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Persistent environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals in ovarian follicular fluid and in vitro fertilization treatment outcome in women. Björvang RD, Damdimopoulou P. Ups J Med Sci; 2020 May 17; 125(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 32093529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A curated knowledgebase on endocrine disrupting chemicals and their biological systems-level perturbations. Karthikeyan BS, Ravichandran J, Mohanraj K, Vivek-Ananth RP, Samal A. Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov 20; 692():281-296. PubMed ID: 31349169 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. New approaches to cope with possible harms of low-dose environmental chemicals. Lee DH, Jacobs DR. J Epidemiol Community Health; 2019 Mar 20; 73(3):193-197. PubMed ID: 30635437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing exposure of young children to common endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the home environment: a review and commentary of the questionnaire-based approach. English K, Healy B, Jagals P, Sly PD. Rev Environ Health; 2015 Mar 20; 30(1):25-49. PubMed ID: 25719288 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]